151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24658254)
1. Smart tissue anastomosis robot (STAR): a vision-guided robotics system for laparoscopic suturing.
Leonard S; Wu KL; Kim Y; Krieger A; Kim PC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1305-17. PubMed ID: 24658254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The benefits of automated suturing devices in gynecologic endoscopic surgeries: the Endo Stitch and SILS Stitch.
Hart S
Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():159-64. PubMed ID: 23225593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autonomous Laparoscopic Robotic Suturing with a Novel Actuated Suturing Tool and 3D Endoscope.
Saeidi H; Le HND; Opfermann JD; Leonard S; Kim A; Hsieh MH; Kang JU; Krieger A
IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom; 2019 May; 2019():1541-1547. PubMed ID: 33628614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery.
Kenngott HG; Muller-Stich BP; Reiter MA; Rassweiler J; Gutt CN
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 18609002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis.
Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb; 17(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12399841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?
Yohannes P; Rotariu P; Pinto P; Smith AD; Lee BR
Urology; 2002 Jul; 60(1):39-45; discussion 45. PubMed ID: 12100918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?
Nio D; Bemelman WA; Balm R; Legemate DA
Surg Endosc; 2005 Aug; 19(8):1071-6. PubMed ID: 16021377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model.
Ruurda JP; Broeders IA; Pulles B; Kappelhof FM; van der Werken C
Surg Endosc; 2004 Aug; 18(8):1249-52. PubMed ID: 15164281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks.
Garcia-Ruiz A; Gagner M; Miller JH; Steiner CP; Hahn JF
Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 9749847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents.
Marecik SJ; Chaudhry V; Jan A; Pearl RK; Park JJ; Prasad LM
Am J Surg; 2007 Mar; 193(3):349-55; discussion 355. PubMed ID: 17320533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C
Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.
Nio D; Balm R; Maartense S; Guijt M; Bemelman WA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 27(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 14760597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes.
Williams SB; Alemozaffar M; Lei Y; Hevelone N; Lipsitz SR; Plaster BA; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2010 Dec; 58(6):875-81. PubMed ID: 20708331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The benefits of using barbed sutures with automated suturing devices in gynecologic endoscopic surgeries.
Hart S; Sobolewski CJ
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():161-5. PubMed ID: 24081852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model.
Passerotti CC; Passerotti AM; Dall'Oglio MF; Leite KR; Nunes RL; Srougi M; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 19476793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
Dakin GF; Gagner M
Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience related factors compensate for haptic loss in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Cundy TP; Gattas NE; Yang GZ; Darzi A; Najmaldin AS
J Endourol; 2014 May; 28(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 24397464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ergonomic use of the fourth arm to oversew the dorsal vascular complex (DVC) during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
Karim O; Rao A; Marsdin E; Kavia R; Parnham A; Motiwala H; Laniado M
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):179-80. PubMed ID: 23323700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
