These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24659170)

  • 1. Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: evidence of task-specific temporal preparation.
    Schröter H; Birngruber T; Bratzke D; Miller J; Ulrich R
    Psychol Res; 2015 Mar; 79(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 24659170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The determinants of the non-motoric CNV in a complex, variable foreperiod, information processing paradigm.
    Frost BG; Neill RA; Fenelon B
    Biol Psychol; 1988 Aug; 27(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 3251557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice?
    Jurczyk V; Mittelstädt V; Fröber K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1066-1083. PubMed ID: 32067103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit temporal predictability enhances pitch discrimination sensitivity and biases the phase of delta oscillations in auditory cortex.
    Herbst SK; Obleser J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116198. PubMed ID: 31539590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term memory of temporal information revisited.
    Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1776-1782. PubMed ID: 32347377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of time and tasks upon auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in man.
    Lille F; Audin G; Hazemann P
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Sep; 39(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 50221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term facilitation of return: a response-retrieval effect.
    Rajsic J; Bi Y; Wilson DE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):418-24. PubMed ID: 24002966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning temporal context shapes prestimulus alpha oscillations and improves visual discrimination performance.
    Toosi T; K Tousi E; Esteky H
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118(2):771-777. PubMed ID: 28515289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Formation of Symmetrical Gestalts Is Task-Independent, but Can Be Enhanced by Active Regularity Discrimination.
    Makin ADJ; Rampone G; Morris A; Bertamini M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):353-366. PubMed ID: 31633466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance.
    De Jong R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):2-25. PubMed ID: 7754082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reach preparation enhances visual performance and appearance.
    Rolfs M; Lawrence BM; Carrasco M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 368(1628):20130057. PubMed ID: 24018719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparatory ERPs in visual, auditory, and somatosensory discriminative motor tasks.
    Bianco V; Berchicci M; Livio Perri R; Quinzi F; Mussini E; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13687. PubMed ID: 32970337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?
    Bae GY; Luck SJ
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):268-287. PubMed ID: 30069870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Respiratory fluctuations in pupil diameter are not maintained during cognitive tasks.
    Nakamura NH; Fukunaga M; Oku Y
    Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2019 Jul; 265():68-75. PubMed ID: 30021125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-target alpha power predicts the speed of cued target discrimination.
    Petro NM; Thigpen NN; Garcia S; Boylan MR; Keil A
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():878-885. PubMed ID: 30703522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.