214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24660204)
1. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols.
Gallucci GO; Benic GI; Eckert SE; Papaspyridakos P; Schimmel M; Schrott A; Weber HP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():287-90. PubMed ID: 24660204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implants (3.3 mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: a retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 19681926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols.
Weber HP; Morton D; Gallucci GO; Roccuzzo M; Cordaro L; Grutter L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24 Suppl():180-3. PubMed ID: 19885445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Loading protocols and implant supported restorations proposed for the rehabilitation of partially and fully edentulous jaws. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report.
Schwarz F; Sanz-Martín I; Kern JS; Taylor T; Schaer A; Wolfart S; Sanz M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):988-92. PubMed ID: 26748679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed using stereolithographic guided surgery: a prospective monocenter study.
D'haese J; Vervaeke S; Verbanck N; De Bruyn H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 23377067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-year results of maxillary overdentures supported by 2 titanium-zirconium implants - implant survival rates and radiographic outcomes.
Zembic A; Tahmaseb A; Jung RE; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e60-e67. PubMed ID: 27150942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part II.
Warreth A; Byrne C; Alkadhimi AF; Woods E; Sultan A
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015; 61(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26285567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading.
Nordin T; Nilsson R; Frykholm A; Hallman M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 15623065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results.
Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 17991252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timing of loading--immediate, early, or delayed--in the outcome of implants in the edentulous mandible: a prospective clinical trial.
De Smet E; Duyck J; Vander Sloten J; Jacobs R; Naert I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):580-94. PubMed ID: 17929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism.
Behneke A; Behneke N; d'Hoedt B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 12507239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla.
Fischer K; Stenberg T; Hedin M; Sennerby L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 18371094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of implant surface modifications on survival and bone loss of immediately loaded implants in the edentulous mandible.
Vervaeke S; Collaert B; De Bruyn H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1352-7. PubMed ID: 24066328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla.
Jemt T
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 18950060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines.
De Bruyn H; Raes S; Ostman PO; Cosyn J
Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):153-87. PubMed ID: 25123767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience with the Brånemark implant system: 1985-1995.
Shackleton JL; Solomons YF; Lownie MA
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Dec; 51(12):810-4. PubMed ID: 9462043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss.
Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):707-14. PubMed ID: 17697000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone level change of multiple adjacent implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted restorations: a 5-year prospective study.
Vigolo P; Zaccaria M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1189-94. PubMed ID: 21197497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants in a 10-year prospective comparative study.
de Jong MH; Wright PS; Meijer HJ; Tymstra N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1168-74. PubMed ID: 21197494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hard and soft tissue reactions to ITI screw implants: 3-year longitudinal results of a prospective study.
Behneke A; Behneke N; d'Hoedt B; Wagner W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 9425755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
