BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24660204)

  • 61. A randomized controlled clinical trial of two types of tapered implants on immediate loading in the posterior maxilla and mandible.
    Kim YK; Lee JH; Lee JY; Yi YJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1602-11. PubMed ID: 24278929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Management of an implant case that required retreatment: a case report.
    Samborski CS
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 12500869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Biomechanics of the Brånemark system.
    Rangert B
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1995; 9 Suppl():39-48. PubMed ID: 9063139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Brånemark Novum implant system: rehabilitating the edentulous mandible.
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Aug; 13(8):57-63. PubMed ID: 12375401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Small-diameter implants: a treatment consideration for the maxillary edentulous patient.
    Jackson BJ
    Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):86, 88, 90-2; quiz 93. PubMed ID: 24358544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: a review of the literature since 1999.
    Sorní M; Guarinós J; García O; Peñarrocha M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005 Apr; 10 Suppl 1():E45-56. PubMed ID: 15800467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The extremely resorbed mandible: a comparative prospective study of 2-year results with 3 treatment strategies.
    Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 15346755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Prosthetic implant challenges.
    Strong SM
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 19284190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A 5-year prospective clinical study of submerged and nonsubmerged Paragon system implants in the edentulous mandible.
    Eliasson A; Narby B; Ekstrand K; Hirsch J; Johansson A; Wennerberg A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 20552088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Dental implant performance in vertically distracted fibular grafts after mandibular reconstruction: a pilot series of 12 patients.
    Wang F; Wu Y; Zhang C; Zhang Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1311-21. PubMed ID: 24066323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Fabrication of a maxillary implant-supported overdenture retained by two cemented bars: a clinical report.
    Uludag B; Sahin V; Celik G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 17547940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Implant complications and failures: the complete overdenture.
    Watson CJ; Tinsley D; Sharma S
    Dent Update; 2001 Jun; 28(5):234-8, 240. PubMed ID: 11490634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Modification of a smooth staple implant abutment.
    Maalhagh-Fard A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 22867811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. There is not an optimum number of implants for an overdenture.
    Byrne G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Oct; 146(10):773-4. PubMed ID: 26409988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis.
    Verde MA; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Mar; 69(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 8445558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Application of oral implants to the general dental practice.
    Stanford CM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Aug; 136(8):1092-100; quiz 1165-6. PubMed ID: 16161363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Essentials of case planning for osseointegrated implants.
    Watson RM; Forman GH; Welfare RD
    Br Dent J; 1988 May; 164(10):313-8. PubMed ID: 3291919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Risk analysis and preventive strategies of implant placement in patients with hypertension].
    Xu YZ; Wang SY; Zhou C; He FM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 57(4):430-435. PubMed ID: 35368172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A subsequent two-stage dental implant system and its clinical application.
    Arvidson K
    Periodontol 2000; 1998 Jun; 17():96-105. PubMed ID: 10337317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Dental implant loss in older versus younger patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Sendyk DI; Rovai ES; Pannuti CM; Deboni MC; Sendyk WR; Wennerberg A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 44(3):229-236. PubMed ID: 27917518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.