These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24660403)

  • 1. Practice-based, clinical trial of a silorane-based composite resin system in posterior teeth.
    Malhotra N; Somashekar ST; Mala K; Pai V; Shenoy R
    SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):358, 360-3. PubMed ID: 24660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Giráldez I; Ceballos L
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations.
    Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Ceballos L
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 23570300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled trial of the 2-year clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in class 1 posterior restorations.
    Efes BG; Yaman BC; Gurbuz O; Gumuştaş B
    Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23724547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Marques IP; de Oliveira FBS; Souza JGS; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; França FMG; Popoff DAV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up.
    Gönülol N; Kalyoncuoğlu E; Ertaş E; Misilli T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 30293184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of a silorane-based resin composite in class 2 restorations: 18-month follow-up.
    Gonçalves FS; Leal CD; Bueno AC; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Magalhães CS
    Am J Dent; 2013 Apr; 26(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 24073532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration: effect of simultaneous bonding.
    Shafiei F; Akbarian S
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E22-30. PubMed ID: 23865583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylatebased composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite.
    Popoff DA; de Magalhães CS; de Freitas Oliveira W; Soares LA; de Almeida Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 25516879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microtensile bond strength of a new silorane-based composite resin adhesive.
    Giacobbi MF; Vandewalle KS
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e148-52. PubMed ID: 22623470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two year clinical evaluation of a low-shrink resin composite material in UK general dental practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; James A; Mackenzie L; Pal A; Sands P; Thompson O; Palin WM
    Dent Mater; 2011 Jul; 27(7):622-30. PubMed ID: 21514654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
    Demirci M; Yildiz E; Uysal O
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.