BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

883 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24661241)

  • 1. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.
    Koo KC; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Yang SC; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):781-5. PubMed ID: 24661241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended vs standard lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: a propensity-score-matching analysis.
    Kim KH; Lim SK; Kim HY; Shin TY; Lee JY; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 23356436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?
    Punnen S; Meng MV; Cooperberg MR; Greene KL; Cowan JE; Carroll PR
    BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E314-20. PubMed ID: 23451984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
    Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients.
    Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Nagao G; Nakagami Y; Ohno Y; Horiguchi Y; Namiki K; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
    Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 25339062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
    Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
    Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matching study.
    Lee JY; Diaz RR; Cho KS; Yu HS; Chung JS; Ham WS; Choi YD
    Int J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1169-76. PubMed ID: 23521086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative investigation on clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between experienced open prostatic surgeons and novice open surgeons in a laparoscopically naïve center with a limited caseload.
    Sumitomo M; Kanao K; Kato Y; Yoshizawa T; Watanabe M; Zennami K; Nakamura K
    Int J Urol; 2015 May; 22(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 25721437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?
    Lim SK; Kim KH; Shin TY; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 23106163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.
    Wallerstedt A; Tyritzis SI; Thorsteinsdottir T; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Gustafsson O; Hugosson J; Bjartell A; Wilderäng U; Wiklund NP; Steineck G; Haglind E;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 25308968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis.
    Koizumi A; Narita S; Nara T; Takayama K; Kanda S; Numakura K; Tsuruta H; Maeno A; Huang M; Saito M; Inoue T; Tsuchiya N; Satoh S; Nanjo H; Habuchi T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 48(8):765-770. PubMed ID: 29931077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.
    Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Novara G; Wilson TG
    BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 23351148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
    Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.
    Tozawa K; Yasui T; Umemoto Y; Mizuno K; Okada A; Kawai N; Takahashi S; Kohri K
    Int J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):976-9. PubMed ID: 24912809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.