177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24661350)
1. The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D, SF-6D and Diabetes Health Profile-18 in type 2 diabetes.
Mulhern B; Meadows K
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 24661350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative performance of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D index scores in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Sayah FA; Qiu W; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2057-2066. PubMed ID: 28364183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.
Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; Gerónimo-Pardo M
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):649-662. PubMed ID: 32065301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in the general population of Chengdu city in China.
Zhao L; Liu X; Liu D; He Y; Liu Z; Li N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(11):e14719. PubMed ID: 30882636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand.
Dritsaki M; Petrou S; Williams M; Lamb SE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Jan; 15(1):20. PubMed ID: 28118833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Generic and Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Epilepsy: EQ-5D-3L and NEWQOL-6D.
Mulhern B; Pink J; Rowen D; Borghs S; Butt T; Hughes D; Marson A; Brazier J
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):687-693. PubMed ID: 28408012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of measurement properties between UK SF-6D and English EQ-5D-5L and Thai EQ-5D-5L value sets in general Thai population.
Kangwanrattanakul K
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 32981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients.
Wu J; Han Y; Zhao FL; Zhou J; Chen Z; Sun H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 25343944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of the psychometric properties of generic utility measures in multiple sclerosis.
Kuspinar A; Mayo NE
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Aug; 32(8):759-73. PubMed ID: 24846760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The psychometric performance of generic preference-based measures for patients with pressure ulcers.
Palfreyman S; Mulhern B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Aug; 13():117. PubMed ID: 26231179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire in self-reported diabetes: evidence from a general population survey.
Jankowska A; Młyńczak K; Golicki D
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 33952271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain.
Ye Z; Sun L; Wang Q
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 30971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D among patients with haemophilia.
Xu RH; Dong D; Luo N; Wong EL; Wu Y; Yu S; Yang R; Liu J; Yuan H; Zhang S
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jun; 22(4):547-557. PubMed ID: 33761029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures.
Brazier J; Connell J; Papaioannou D; Mukuria C; Mulhern B; Peasgood T; Jones ML; Paisley S; O'Cathain A; Barkham M; Knapp M; Byford S; Gilbody S; Parry G
Health Technol Assess; 2014 May; 18(34):vii-viii, xiii-xxv, 1-188. PubMed ID: 24857402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Head-to-Head Comparison of UK SF-6D and Thai and UK EQ-5D-5L Value Sets in Thai Patients with Chronic Diseases.
Sakthong P; Munpan W
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Oct; 15(5):669-679. PubMed ID: 28290106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric performance of the CFQ-R-8D compared to the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in people with cystic fibrosis.
Mukuria C; Rowen D; Acaster S; McGarry LJ; Lou Y; Sosnay PR; Quittner AL
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2024 Feb; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 38416239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Harvie HS; Honeycutt AA; Neuwahl SJ; Barber MD; Richter HE; Visco AG; Sung VW; Shepherd JP; Rogers RG; Jakus-Waldman S; Mazloomdoost D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):265.e1-265.e11. PubMed ID: 30471259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
Petrou S; Hockley C
Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
