These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24661649)
1. The Red Journal's outstanding reviewers of 2013. Zietman AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):984-5. PubMed ID: 24661649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Red Journal's Outstanding Reviewer Awards for 2014. Zietman AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):204-5. PubMed ID: 25968818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Author perception of peer review. Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct. Peh WC; Ng KH Singapore Med J; 2010 Dec; 51(12):908-12. PubMed ID: 21221494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The four Rs of the Red Journal: a progress report from the new editorial team. Zietman A; Bennett KE Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 23920384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals. Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outstanding Reviewers for Food & Function in 2016. Food Funct; 2017 Mar; 8(3):906. PubMed ID: 28332671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Paper acceptance time in respiratory research: room for improvement? Ronit A; Vestbo J Eur Respir J; 2017 Feb; 49(2):. PubMed ID: 28179441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Red Journal's most downloaded articles of 2012. Zietman AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jun; 86(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23643376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Red Journal's most downloaded physics articles of 2012. Klein EE Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jun; 86(2):222-3. PubMed ID: 23642623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The red journal's top 10 most downloaded articles of 2011. Zietman A Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jul; 83(4):1073-4. PubMed ID: 22710025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Opening the Black Box of Peer Review. Saxe JP Cell Stem Cell; 2019 Jun; 24(6):843-848. PubMed ID: 31173714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Red Journal's Top Downloads of 2014. Zietman A Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Sep; 93(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 26279016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [What should a medical journal's purpose be--facts or sponsored entertainment?]. Milerad J Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(50):5062-3. PubMed ID: 12572295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An update on the Journal's progress. Brennan PA Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 47(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 19643516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The journal's performance and upcoming new features. Hupp JR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1481-3. PubMed ID: 23948361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. . . . and the Journal's policies. Healing E N Engl J Med; 1994 Feb; 330(7):503; author reply 504. PubMed ID: 8289859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes to viewpoints. Schnoor JL; Gentleman DJ Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):4831. PubMed ID: 20536228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider. Kulstad E PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]