263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24661669)
1. Quality Assurance with Plan Veto: reincarnation of a record and verify system and its potential value.
Noel CE; Gutti V; Bosch W; Mutic S; Ford E; Terezakis S; Santanam L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):1161-6. PubMed ID: 24661669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of new technologies on radiation oncology events and trends in the past decade: an institutional experience.
Hunt MA; Pastrana G; Amols HI; Killen A; Alektiar K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 22494585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Significance of using DICOM communication standard in quality assurance in radiation oncology - an institutional experience.
Tobias P; Vrana D; Cwiertka K; Gremlica D; Slampa P
J BUON; 2013; 18(4):1045-7. PubMed ID: 24344036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimizing efficiency and safety in external beam radiotherapy using automated plan check (APC) tool and six sigma methodology.
Liu S; Bush KK; Bertini J; Fu Y; Lewis JM; Pham DJ; Yang Y; Niedermayr TR; Skinner L; Xing L; Beadle BM; Hsu A; Kovalchuk N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):56-64. PubMed ID: 31423729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-time management of incident learning reports in a radiation oncology department.
Wright JL; Parekh A; Rhieu BH; Opris V; Souranis A; Choflet A; Viswanathan AN; DeWeese TL; McNutt T; Terezakis SA
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(5):e337-e345. PubMed ID: 29907503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eliminating inconsistencies in simulation and treatment planning orders in radiation therapy.
Santanam L; Brame RS; Lindsey A; Dewees T; Danieley J; Labrash J; Parikh P; Bradley J; Zoberi I; Michalski J; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):484-91. PubMed ID: 22572077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive quality assurance program for personnel and procedures in radiation oncology: value of voluntary error reporting and checklists.
Kalapurakal JA; Zafirovski A; Smith J; Fisher P; Sathiaseelan V; Barnard C; Rademaker AW; Rave N; Mittal BB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jun; 86(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 23561649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and feasibility of STAT RAD: Improvement of a novel rapid tomotherapy-based radiation therapy workflow by failure mode and effects analysis.
Jones RT; Handsfield L; Read PW; Wilson DD; Van Ausdal R; Schlesinger DJ; Siebers JV; Chen Q
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 25413416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of pretreatment physics plan review for detecting errors in radiation therapy.
Gopan O; Zeng J; Novak A; Nyflot M; Ford E
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5181. PubMed ID: 27587048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of failure mode and effects analysis to intraoperative radiation therapy using mobile electron linear accelerators.
Ciocca M; Cantone MC; Veronese I; Cattani F; Pedroli G; Molinelli S; Vitolo V; Orecchia R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):e305-11. PubMed ID: 21708432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A real-time safety and quality reporting system: assessment of clinical data and staff participation.
Rahn DA; Kim GY; Mundt AJ; Pawlicki T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1202-7. PubMed ID: 25442045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
Lefresne S; Olivotto IA; Joe H; Blood PA; Olson RA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):e117-21. PubMed ID: 23195781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A risk assessment of automated treatment planning and recommendations for clinical deployment.
Kisling K; Johnson JL; Simonds H; Zhang L; Jhingran A; Beadle BM; Burger H; du Toit M; Joubert N; Makufa R; Shaw W; Trauernicht C; Balter P; Howell RM; Schmeler K; Court L
Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2567-2574. PubMed ID: 31002389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error in the delivery of radiation therapy: results of a quality assurance review.
Huang G; Medlam G; Lee J; Billingsley S; Bissonnette JP; Ringash J; Kane G; Hodgson DC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1590-5. PubMed ID: 15817367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control quantification (QCQ): a tool to measure the value of quality control checks in radiation oncology.
Ford EC; Terezakis S; Souranis A; Harris K; Gay H; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):e263-9. PubMed ID: 22682808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality in radiotherapy: effective treatment and patient safety.
Nascimento A; Falzon P
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1956-60. PubMed ID: 22317002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance needs for modern image-based radiotherapy: recommendations from 2007 interorganizational symposium on "quality assurance of radiation therapy: challenges of advanced technology".
Williamson JF; Dunscombe PB; Sharpe MB; Thomadsen BR; Purdy JA; Deye JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S2-12. PubMed ID: 18406928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing a radiation error scoring system to monitor quality control events in a radiation oncology department.
Konski A; Movsas B; Konopka M; Ma C; Price R; Pollack A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 19111271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical implementation of failure mode and effects analysis for safety and efficiency in stereotactic radiosurgery.
Younge KC; Wang Y; Thompson J; Giovinazzo J; Finlay M; Sankreacha R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1003-8. PubMed ID: 25670543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of failure mode and effect analysis in a radiation oncology setting: the Cancer Treatment Centers of America experience.
Denny DS; Allen DK; Worthington N; Gupta D
J Healthc Qual; 2014; 36(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 22364244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
