These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24661742)

  • 21. Challenges and issues in moving towards sustainable landfilling in a transitory country - Malaysia.
    Agamuthu P; Fauziah SH
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Jan; 29(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20880936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. LCA of local strategies for energy recovery from waste in England, applied to a large municipal flow.
    Tunesi S
    Waste Manag; 2011 Mar; 31(3):561-71. PubMed ID: 20937556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implementing separate waste collection and mechanical biological waste treatment in South Africa: a comparison with Austria and England.
    Trois C; Simelane OT
    Waste Manag; 2010; 30(8-9):1457-63. PubMed ID: 20116993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating the progress of the UK's Material Recycling Facilities: a mini review.
    Ali M; Courtenay P
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Dec; 32(12):1149-57. PubMed ID: 25391552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Waste management and producer responsibility: a score behind: a new ahead.
    Rotter VS
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Sep; 29(9):889-90. PubMed ID: 21900358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stable isotope signatures for characterising the biological stability of landfilled municipal solid waste.
    Wimmer B; Hrad M; Huber-Humer M; Watzinger A; Wyhlidal S; Reichenauer TG
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2083-90. PubMed ID: 23540355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extended producer responsibility for consumer waste: the gap between economic theory and implementation.
    Dubois M
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):36-42. PubMed ID: 22993134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reverse logistics system and recycling potential at a landfill: A case study from Kampala City.
    Kinobe JR; Gebresenbet G; Niwagaba CB; Vinnerås B
    Waste Manag; 2015 Aug; 42():82-92. PubMed ID: 25936554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures.
    Yang N; Zhang H; Shao LM; Lü F; He PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():510-21. PubMed ID: 24018116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding the side effects of emission trading: implications for waste management.
    Braschel N; Posch A; Pierer M
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 24323330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impacts of policy and market incentives for solid waste recycling in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    Matter A; Ahsan M; Marbach M; Zurbrügg C
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():321-8. PubMed ID: 25736579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Municipal solid waste disposal in Portugal.
    Magrinho A; Didelet F; Semiao V
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(12):1477-89. PubMed ID: 16713239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion.
    Assamoi B; Lawryshyn Y
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1019-30. PubMed ID: 22099926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How to globalize the circular economy.
    Geng Y; Sarkis J; Bleischwitz R
    Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7738):153-155. PubMed ID: 30626948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does industrial waste taxation contribute to reduction of landfilled waste? Dynamic panel analysis considering industrial waste category in Japan.
    Sasao T
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2239-50. PubMed ID: 25154913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Will revolution bring chaos?
    Hill N
    Health Estate; 2003 Nov; 57(10):37-8. PubMed ID: 14655415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tradable permits without legislative targets: a review of the potential for a permit scheme for sterilized clinical waste in the UK.
    Bailey I; Haug B; O'Doherty R
    Waste Manag Res; 2004 Jun; 22(3):202-11. PubMed ID: 15253504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attitudes and behaviour towards waste management in the Dublin, Ireland region.
    Purcell M; Magette WL
    Waste Manag; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 20211552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Flexible and robust strategies for waste management in Sweden.
    Finnveden G; Björklund A; Reich MC; Eriksson O; Sörbom A
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):S1-8. PubMed ID: 17412580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.