1064 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24662411)
1. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
Park EJ; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 24662411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
Pai A; Marecik SJ; Park JJ; Melich G; Sulo S; Prasad LM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 26200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Baik SH; Kim NK; Lim DR; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23417433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.
Ghezzi TL; Luca F; Valvo M; Corleta OC; Zuccaro M; Cenciarelli S; Biffi R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1072-9. PubMed ID: 24646748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution.
Hara M; Sng K; Yoo BE; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kim SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 24819096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.
Kim J; Baek SJ; Kang DW; Roh YE; Lee JW; Kwak HD; Kwak JM; Kim SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Mar; 60(3):266-273. PubMed ID: 28177988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.
Kellokumpu IH; Kairaluoma MI; Nuorva KP; Kautiainen HJ; Jantunen IT
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Aug; 55(8):854-63. PubMed ID: 22810470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.
Erguner I; Aytac E; Boler DE; Atalar B; Baca B; Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I; Uras C
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 23752000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.
Pugliese R; Di Lernia S; Sansonna F; Scandroglio I; Maggioni D; Ferrari GC; Costanzi A; Magistro C; De Carli S
Am J Surg; 2008 Feb; 195(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 18083137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS;
Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes.
Bianchi PP; Rosati R; Bona S; Rottoli M; Elmore U; Ceriani C; Malesci A; Montorsi M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2047-53. PubMed ID: 17906896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
