These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24662505)

  • 1. Biomechanical assessment of anchored cervical interbody cages: comparison of 2-screw and 4-screw designs.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Sep; 10 Suppl 3():412-7; discussion 417. PubMed ID: 24662505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
    Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanics of lateral lumbar interbody fusion constructs with lateral and posterior plate fixation: laboratory investigation.
    Fogel GR; Parikh RD; Ryu SI; Turner AW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 24405464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
    Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Keiler A; Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Gnanalingham K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
    Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
    Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.
    Wojewnik B; Ghanayem AJ; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Potluri T; Havey RM; Zelenakova J; Patel AA; Carandang G; Patwardhan AG
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Jan; 22(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 22850940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques.
    Scholz M; Schleicher P; Pabst S; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E375-80. PubMed ID: 25584947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of an integrated fixation cage during fatigue loading: a human cadaver study.
    Palepu V; Peck JH; Simon DD; Helgeson MD; Nagaraja S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 28128700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a lumbar intervertebral spacer with integrated screws as a stand-alone fixation device.
    Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Turner JL; Castro CA; Armstrong WD; Waugh LG; Dryer RF
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 20084028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.