These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24662908)

  • 1. Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow Region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up.
    Czerwiński E; Borowy P; Kumorek A; Amarowicz J; Górkiewicz M; Milert A
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013; 15(6):617-28. PubMed ID: 24662908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
    Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
    Tamaki J; Iki M; Kadowaki E; Sato Y; Kajita E; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Yoneshima H
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Dec; 22(12):3037-45. PubMed ID: 21279504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High fracture probability predicts fractures in a 4-year follow-up in women from the RAC-OST-POL study.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Czekajło A; Grzeszczak W; Drozdzowska B
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Dec; 26(12):2811-20. PubMed ID: 26168766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.
    Fraser LA; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Ioannidis G; Goltzman D; Adachi JD; Papaioannou A; Josse R; Kovacs CS; Olszynski WP; Towheed T; Hanley DA; Kaiser SM; Prior J; Jamal S; Kreiger N; Brown JP; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA; Leslie WD;
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):829-37. PubMed ID: 21161508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort.
    Azagra R; Roca G; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Zwart M; Güell S; Puchol N; Gene E; Casado E; Sancho P; Solà S; Torán P; Iglesias M; Gisbert MC; López-Expósito F; Pujol-Salud J; Fernandez-Hermida Y; Puente A; Rosàs M; Bou V; Antón JJ; Lansdberg G; Martín-Sánchez JC; Díez-Pérez A; Prieto-Alhambra D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():204. PubMed ID: 23088223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.
    Yu R; Leung J; Woo J
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2014 Dec; 15(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 25262197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of spine-hip discordance on fracture risk assessment and treatment qualification in Canada: the Manitoba BMD registry.
    Leslie WD; Morin SN; Lix LM; Binkley N
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):85. PubMed ID: 32514615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The characteristics of osteoporotic fractures in the region of Bialystok (BOS-2). The application of the WHO algorithm, FRAX®BMI and FRAX®BMD assessment tools to determine patients for intervention.
    Badurski J; Jeziernicka E; Dobreńko A; Nowak N; Daniluk S; Rybaczuk M; Wiśniowiecka M
    Endokrynol Pol; 2011; 62(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 21879467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
    Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
    Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
    Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
    Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX® prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study.
    Iki M; Fujita Y; Tamaki J; Kouda K; Yura A; Sato Y; Moon JS; Winzenrieth R; Okamoto N; Kurumatani N
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1841-8. PubMed ID: 25752623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of osteoporotic fractures in the group of woman over 50 years of age--comparison of tools FRAX BMD versus FRAX BMI].
    Strugala C; Sobala W; Szubert Z; Hanke W
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24261246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of FRAX to characterise fracture risk in Poland.
    Czerwinski E; Kanis JA; Osieleniec J; Kumorek A; Milert A; Johansson H; McCloskey EV; Gorkiewicz M
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Sep; 22(9):2507-12. PubMed ID: 21127840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between body composition and fracture risk using the FRAX model in central south Chinese postmenopausal women.
    Zhang Z; Shen X; Zhang H; Li S; Zhou H; Wu X; Sheng Z; Liao E
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2012 Oct; 77(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 22469329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical bone structure of the proximal femur and incident fractures.
    Nissen FI; Andreasen C; Borgen TT; Bjørnerem Å; Hansen AK
    Bone; 2022 Feb; 155():116284. PubMed ID: 34875395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):839-47. PubMed ID: 20959961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Goltzman D; Hanley DA; Adachi JD; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):817-27. PubMed ID: 21161509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort.
    González-Macías J; Marin F; Vila J; Díez-Pérez A
    Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):373-7. PubMed ID: 22129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):391-7. PubMed ID: 21365460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.