These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24663138)

  • 1. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: overused, neglected, or just misunderstood?
    Laster AJ
    N C Med J; 2014; 75(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 24663138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phalangeal densitometry compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of bone mineral density in elderly women.
    Dhainaut A; Rohde G; Hoff M; Syversen U; Haugeberg G
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Dec; 20(12):1789-95. PubMed ID: 21970521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current role for bone absorptiometry.
    Roux C; Briot K
    Joint Bone Spine; 2017 Jan; 84(1):35-37. PubMed ID: 27282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
    Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement in clinical practice.
    El Maghraoui A; Achemlal L; Bezza A
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 16931345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women.
    Dubois EF; van den Bergh JP; Smals AG; van de Meerendonk CW; Zwinderman AH; Schweitzer DH
    Neth J Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):62-70. PubMed ID: 11166447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When and how to use dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.
    Ettinger MP
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 May; 82(5):352-7. PubMed ID: 7602308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
    Guglielmi G
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 20(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 8536745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Targeted assessment of fracture risk in women at midlife.
    Davis SR; Tan A; Bell RJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1705-12. PubMed ID: 25630574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
    Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone Density Screening and Re-screening in Postmenopausal Women and Older Men.
    Gourlay ML; Overman RA; Ensrud KE
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2015 Dec; 13(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 26408154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is useful for monitoring bone mineral density of the patients who receive hormone replacement therapy.
    Sawada K; Morishige K; Ohmichi M; Nishio Y; Yamamoto T; Hayakawa J; Mabuchi S; Isobe A; Sasaki H; Sakata M; Tasaka K; Murata Y
    Maturitas; 2007 Apr; 56(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 17010541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
    de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of denosumab on trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
    McClung MR; Lippuner K; Brandi ML; Zanchetta JR; Bone HG; Chapurlat R; Hans D; Wang A; Zapalowski C; Libanati C
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Oct; 28(10):2967-2973. PubMed ID: 28748386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations.
    Blake GM; Chinn DJ; Steel SA; Patel R; Panayiotou E; Thorpe J; Fordham JN;
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2149-56. PubMed ID: 16228104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Singh Index does not correlate with bone mineral density (BMD) measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).
    Klatte TO; Vettorazzi E; Beckmann J; Pueschel K; Amling M; Gebauer M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 May; 135(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 25739991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Watts NB
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Nov; 15(11):847-54. PubMed ID: 15322740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of peripheral skeletal assessment at the radius in estimating femoral bone density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a comparative study of single-photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Boonen S; Cheng X; Nicholson PH; Verbeke G; Broos P; Dequeker J
    J Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 242(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 9366811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
    Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation of bone densitometry.
    Genant HK
    Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1997 Jun; 64(6 Suppl):20S-25S. PubMed ID: 9273933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.