These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24664251)

  • 1. Why the impact? Negative affective change as a mediator of the effects of victim impact statements.
    Wevodau AL; Cramer RJ; Kehn A; Clark JW
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Nov; 29(16):2884-903. PubMed ID: 24664251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between victim impact statements and judicial decision making: An archival analysis of sentencing outcomes.
    Dufour GK; Ternes M; Stinson V
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):484-498. PubMed ID: 37347897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.
    McGowan MG; Myers B
    Violence Vict; 2004 Jun; 19(3):357-74. PubMed ID: 15631286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.
    Salerno JM; Bottoms BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 19319835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expressed sexual assault legal context and victim culpability attributions.
    Miller AK; Markman KD; Amacker AM; Menaker TA
    J Interpers Violence; 2012 Apr; 27(6):1023-39. PubMed ID: 22048875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of criminal justice involvement on victims' mental health.
    Parsons J; Bergin T
    J Trauma Stress; 2010 Apr; 23(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 20225265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Gender on Perceptions of Credibility in Child Sexual Assault Cases: A Systematic Review.
    Voogt A; Klettke B
    J Child Sex Abus; 2017; 26(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 28350262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Juror Decision Making in Race-Based and Sexual Orientation-Based Hate Crime Cases.
    Gamblin BW; Kehn A; Vanderzanden K; Ruthig JC; Jones KM; Long BL
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Apr; 36(7-8):3231-3256. PubMed ID: 29766757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Appropriately upset? Emotion norms and perceptions of crime victims.
    Rose MR; Nadler J; Clark J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):203-19. PubMed ID: 16786407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotion and the law: a framework for inquiry.
    Wiener RL; Bornstein BH; Voss A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):231-48. PubMed ID: 16786409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Purposing and repurposing harms: the victim impact statement and sexual assault.
    Miller KL
    Qual Health Res; 2013 Nov; 23(11):1445-58. PubMed ID: 24122518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation of affect control theory to the sentencing of criminals.
    Tsoudis O
    J Soc Psychol; 2000 Aug; 140(4):473-85. PubMed ID: 10981376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiovisual communication and therapeutic jurisprudence: Cognitive and social psychological dimensions.
    Feigenson N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):336-40. PubMed ID: 20920823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why emotions matter: expectancy violation and affective response mediate the emotional victim effect.
    Ask K; Landström S
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 20107882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.
    Lynch KR; Wasarhaley NE; Golding JM; Simcic T
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Nov; 28(16):3205-22. PubMed ID: 23929601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
    Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.