These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

620 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24665089)

  • 1. Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
    Baba S; Isoda T; Maruoka Y; Kitamura Y; Sasaki M; Yoshida T; Honda H
    J Nucl Med; 2014 May; 55(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 24665089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
    Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
    Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficients on diffusion-weighted MRI and standardized uptake value on FDG-PET/CT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Eguchi H; Nagano H; Wakasa K; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1034-41. PubMed ID: 25267921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
    Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
    Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Heusch P; Köhler J; Wittsack HJ; Heusner TA; Buchbender C; Poeppel TD; Nensa F; Wetter A; Gauler T; Hartung V; Lanzman RS
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2055-60. PubMed ID: 23830904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): does the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) correlate with tracer uptake (SUV)?
    Regier M; Derlin T; Schwarz D; Laqmani A; Henes FO; Groth M; Buhk JH; Kooijman H; Adam G
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2913-8. PubMed ID: 22197090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of prognostic significance between primary tumor standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient.
    Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Kamiyama T; Yonekura R; Fukukura Y; Matsuzaki T; Nishimoto K; Nomoto M; Koriyama C
    Clin Nucl Med; 2012 May; 37(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 22475897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules/masses: comparison with positron emission tomography.
    Mori T; Nomori H; Ikeda K; Kawanaka K; Shiraishi S; Katahira K; Yamashita Y
    J Thorac Oncol; 2008 Apr; 3(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 18379353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous [18F]FDG-PET/MRI: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in Primary and Recurrent Cervical Cancer.
    Brandmaier P; Purz S; Bremicker K; Höckel M; Barthel H; Kluge R; Kahn T; Sabri O; Stumpp P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141684. PubMed ID: 26551527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metabolomics of Breast Cancer Using High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Correlations with 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging MRI.
    Yoon H; Yoon D; Yun M; Choi JS; Park VY; Kim EK; Jeong J; Koo JS; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim S; Kim MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159949. PubMed ID: 27459480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diffusion-weighted imaging and FDG PET/CT: predicting the prognoses with apparent diffusion coefficient values and maximum standardized uptake values in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Choi BB; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Lee JH; Song BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW
    World J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 10():126. PubMed ID: 22741544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective Correlation of Prognostic Immunohistochemical Markers With SUV and ADC Derived From Dedicated Hybrid Breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Morawitz J; Kirchner J; Martin O; Bruckmann NM; Dietzel F; Li Y; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Bittner AK; Mohrmann S; Ingenwerth M; Häberle L; Esposito I; Antoch G; Buchbender C; Sawicki LM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 46(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 33351505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
    Byun BH; Noh WC; Lim I; Lee SS; Cho AR; Park JA; Kim KM; Kim HA; Kim EK; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
    Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 27(8):720-8. PubMed ID: 23700260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): a pilot study on the assessment of treatment response in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Schmidt S; Dunet V; Koehli M; Montemurro M; Meuli R; Prior JO
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):837-42. PubMed ID: 23761549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Yoo IR; Jung JY; Im SA; Chung YG; Kang JH
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20181051. PubMed ID: 31322913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
    Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of
    Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.