These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24665143)

  • 1. US court will hear religious challenge to health law's contraceptive mandate.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2014 Mar; 348():g2336. PubMed ID: 24665143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Religious freedom and women's health--the litigation on contraception.
    Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Jan; 368(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23252500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When religious freedom clashes with access to care.
    Cohen IG; Lynch HF; Curfman GD
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(7):596-9. PubMed ID: 24988298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health reform and the Supreme Court: the ACA survives the battle of the broccoli and fortifies itself against future fatal attack.
    Ouellette A
    Albany Law Rev; 2012-2013; 76(1):87-119. PubMed ID: 23577375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The severability of the individual mandate.
    Sessions SY; Detsky AS
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Mar; 366(13):e19. PubMed ID: 22417202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The religious exemption to mandated insurance coverage of contraception.
    Sonfield A
    Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 23116956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US Supreme Court will hear challenge to Obamacare subsidies.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6730. PubMed ID: 25384501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wearing the crown of Solomon? Chief Justice Roberts and the Affordable Care Act "tax".
    Muise RJ; Yerushalmi D
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2013 Apr; 38(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23262766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In the balance: With the drama of Supreme Court arguments over, providers are left to worry what will happen if the individual mandate is struck down.
    Carlson J; Selvam A
    Mod Healthc; 2012 Apr; 42(14):6-7, 14-5, 1. PubMed ID: 22533173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supreme Court review of the health care reform law.
    Curfman GD; Abel BS; Landers RM
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Mar; 366(11):977-9. PubMed ID: 22375936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Money, sex, and religion--the Supreme Court's ACA sequel.
    Annas GJ; Ruger TW; Ruger JP
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(9):862-6. PubMed ID: 25029337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 'sleeper' issues before the Supreme Court as it reviews the Affordable Care Act.
    Goldman TR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Mar; 31(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 22392656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hobby Lobby, corporate law, and the theory of the firm: why for-profit corporations are RFRA persons.
    Meese AJ; Oman NB
    Harv Law Rev; 2014 May; 127(7):273-301. PubMed ID: 25330559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court arguments on the ACA--a clash of two world views.
    Hall MA
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Apr; 366(16):1462-3. PubMed ID: 22475540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reframing federalism--the Affordable Care Act (and broccoli) in the Supreme Court.
    Mariner WK; Glantz LH; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Sep; 367(12):1154-8. PubMed ID: 22809363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Path set for ACA? Proponents, foes of law appeal to Supreme Court.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2011 Oct; 41(40):12. PubMed ID: 22049853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
    Harv Law Rev; 2012 Nov; 126(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 25330555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How does religious affiliation affect women's attitudes toward reproductive health policy? Implications for the Affordable Care Act.
    Patton EW; Hall KS; Dalton VK
    Contraception; 2015 Jun; 91(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 25727764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exemption from ACA contraception requirement. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 2014 WL 2921709, (2014).
    Benefits Q; 2014; 30(3):43. PubMed ID: 25509676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contraception showdown.
    Van Biema D
    Time; 2014 Jul 7-14; 184(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25138006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.