These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24665972)

  • 1. Atrial fibrillation burden estimates derived from intermittent rhythm monitoring are unreliable estimates of the true atrial fibrillation burden.
    Charitos EI; Ziegler PD; Stierle U; Robinson DR; Graf B; Sievers HH; Hanke T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 37(9):1210-8. PubMed ID: 24665972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comprehensive evaluation of rhythm monitoring strategies for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from 647 continuously monitored patients and implications for monitoring after therapeutic interventions.
    Charitos EI; Stierle U; Ziegler PD; Baldewig M; Robinson DR; Sievers HH; Hanke T
    Circulation; 2012 Aug; 126(7):806-14. PubMed ID: 22824434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How often should we monitor for reliable detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence? Efficiency considerations and implications for study design.
    Charitos EI; Ziegler PD; Stierle U; Robinson DR; Graf B; Sievers HH; Hanke T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89022. PubMed ID: 24563690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent monitoring of atrial arrhythmias.
    Ziegler PD; Koehler JL; Mehra R
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 Dec; 3(12):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17161787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.
    Veasey RA; Arya A; Silberbauer J; Sharma V; Lloyd GW; Patel NR; Sulke AN
    Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A detector for a chronic implantable atrial tachyarrhythmia monitor.
    Sarkar S; Ritscher D; Mehra R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1219-24. PubMed ID: 18334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical classifications of atrial fibrillation poorly reflect its temporal persistence: insights from 1,195 patients continuously monitored with implantable devices.
    Charitos EI; Pürerfellner H; Glotzer TV; Ziegler PD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 63(25 Pt A):2840-8. PubMed ID: 24814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Burden of atrial fibrillation and poor rate control detected by continuous monitoring and the risk for heart failure hospitalization.
    Sarkar S; Koehler J; Crossley GH; Tang WH; Abraham WT; Warman EN; Whellan DJ
    Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 23067922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing arrhythmia burden after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using an implantable loop recorder: the ABACUS study.
    Kapa S; Epstein AE; Callans DJ; Garcia FC; Lin D; Bala R; Riley MP; Hutchinson MD; Gerstenfeld EP; Tzou W; Marchlinski FE; Frankel DS; Cooper JM; Supple G; Deo R; Verdino RJ; Patel VV; Dixit S
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 24(8):875-81. PubMed ID: 23577826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitor in detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation: Results of the XPECT trial.
    Hindricks G; Pokushalov E; Urban L; Taborsky M; Kuck KH; Lebedev D; Rieger G; Pürerfellner H;
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2010 Apr; 3(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 20160169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring of atrial fibrillation burden after surgical ablation: relevancy of end-point criteria after radiofrequency ablation treatment of patients with lone atrial fibrillation.
    Beukema R; Beukema WP; Sie HT; Misier AR; Delnoy PP; Elvan A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Dec; 9(6):956-9. PubMed ID: 19762419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for atrial fibrillation.
    Camm AJ; Corbucci G; Padeletti L
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 110(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 22503584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of atrial fibrillation monitor characteristics to predict severity of symptoms of atrial fibrillation.
    Patel N; Chung EH; Mounsey JP; Schwartz JD; Pursell I; Gehi AK
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 May; 113(10):1674-8. PubMed ID: 24698459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with silent episodes: intermittent versus continuous monitoring.
    Doliwa PS; Rosenqvist M; Frykman V
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2012 Jun; 46(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 22292612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Twenty-four-hour holter monitor follow-up does not provide accurate heart rhythm status after surgical atrial fibrillation ablation therapy: up to 12 months experience with a novel permanently implantable heart rhythm monitor device.
    Hanke T; Charitos EI; Stierle U; Karluss A; Kraatz E; Graf B; Hagemann A; Misfeld M; Sievers HH
    Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(11 Suppl):S177-84. PubMed ID: 19752365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prevalence of sinus rhythm in patients with "permanent" atrial fibrillation.
    Ziegler PD; Sakaguchi S; Simons GR; Koehler JL; Warman E
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 37(6):674-81. PubMed ID: 24499313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with bradyarrhythmias.
    Saksena S; Hettrick DA; Koehler JL; Grammatico A; Padeletti L
    Am Heart J; 2007 Nov; 154(5):884-92. PubMed ID: 17967594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of an implantable monitor to detect arrhythmia recurrences and select patients for early repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a pilot study.
    Pokushalov E; Romanov A; Corbucci G; Artyomenko S; Turov A; Shirokova N; Karaskov A
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Dec; 4(6):823-31. PubMed ID: 21930653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
    Piccini JP; Passman R; Turakhia M; Connolly AT; Nabutovsky Y; Varma N
    Europace; 2019 Mar; 21(3):404-413. PubMed ID: 30462208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence verified by implantable loop recorder monitoring following a convergent epicardial and endocardial ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Gersak B; Pernat A; Robic B; Sinkovec M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1059-66. PubMed ID: 22587585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.