These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24666164)

  • 1. On the utility of positive and negative feedback in a paired-associate learning task.
    Arbel Y; Murphy A; Donchin E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 24666164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the relationship between learning strategy and feedback processing in the weather prediction task--Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rustemeier M; Schwabe L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 23347964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.
    Holroyd CB; Hajcak G; Larsen JT
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 16427615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Neurophysiological examination of quality of learning in a feedback-based learning task.
    Arbel Y; Wu H
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):13-20. PubMed ID: 27713069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory.
    Luque D; López FJ; Marco-Pallares J; Càmara E; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 21981667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medial frontal negativity reflects learning from positive feedback.
    Van Der Helden J; Boksem MA
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Aug; 49(8):1109-13. PubMed ID: 22725655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To choose or to avoid: age differences in learning from positive and negative feedback.
    Eppinger B; Kray J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 19925176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From Positivity to Negativity Bias: Ambiguity Affects the Neurophysiological Signatures of Feedback Processing.
    Gibbons H; Schnuerch R; Stahl J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 26765948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.
    Donkers FC; Nieuwenhuis S; van Boxtel GJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):777-87. PubMed ID: 16249075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of feedback processing in toddlers.
    Meyer M; Bekkering H; Janssen DJ; de Bruijn ER; Hunnius S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1519-27. PubMed ID: 24392905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affective-motivational influences on feedback-related ERPs in a gambling task.
    Masaki H; Takeuchi S; Gehring WJ; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 16483556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human oscillatory activity associated to reward processing in a gambling task.
    Marco-Pallares J; Cucurell D; Cunillera T; García R; Andrés-Pueyo A; Münte TF; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 17804025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frontal theta oscillatory activity is a common mechanism for the computation of unexpected outcomes and learning rate.
    Mas-Herrero E; Marco-Pallarés J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):447-58. PubMed ID: 24188368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bringing in the negative reinforcements: the avoidance feedback-related negativity.
    Crowley MJ; Wu J; Bailey CA; Mayes LC
    Neuroreport; 2009 Nov; 20(17):1513-7. PubMed ID: 19829164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It's all about timing: An electrophysiological examination of feedback-based learning with immediate and delayed feedback.
    Arbel Y; Hong L; Baker TE; Holroyd CB
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():179-186. PubMed ID: 28284986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural coding of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes: dissociations between active and observational learning.
    Bellebaum C; Jokisch D; Gizewski ER; Forsting M; Daum I
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 227(1):241-51. PubMed ID: 22074898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress effects on learning and feedback-related neural activity depend on feedback delay.
    Paul M; Bellebaum C; Ghio M; Suchan B; Wolf OT
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13471. PubMed ID: 31976590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.