BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24666192)

  • 1. The power of contextual effects in forensic anthropology: a study of biasability in the visual interpretations of trauma analysis on skeletal remains.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Hanson I; Dozzi N
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(5):1177-83. PubMed ID: 24666192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Dror IE; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24796950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hierarchy of expert performance as applied to forensic anthropology.
    Hartley S; Winburn AP
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1617-1626. PubMed ID: 34180547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Traumatic injury pattern analysis in a light rail transit death: a retrospective case study.
    Kendell AE; Fleischman JM; Fulginiti LC
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):764-9. PubMed ID: 25689938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation.
    Dror IE; Hampikian G
    Sci Justice; 2011 Dec; 51(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 22137054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?
    Osborne NK; Woods S; Kieser J; Zajac R
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 25002044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metric forensic anthropology decisions: Reliability and biasability of sectioning-point-based sex estimates.
    Hartley S; Winburn AP; Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 34725824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal evidence for child abuse: a physical anthropological perspective.
    Walker PL; Cook DC; Lambert PM
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 9068177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cascading Bias of Initial Exposure to Information at the Crime Scene to the Subsequent Evaluation of Skeletal Remains.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Morgan RM; Rando C; Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):403-411. PubMed ID: 28678377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The link between traumatic injury in soft and hard tissue.
    Quatrehomme G; Alunni V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():118-128. PubMed ID: 31153989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional imaging in forensic anthropology: a test study using the Macintosh.
    Ackermann RR
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Jan; 42(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 8988579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements.
    Adams BJ; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1193-202. PubMed ID: 12455639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the Scoring of Human Decomposition from Digital Images to Scoring Using On-site Observations.
    Dabbs GR; Bytheway JA; Connor M
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Sep; 62(5):1292-1296. PubMed ID: 28120394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The forensic evaluation of burned skeletal remains: a synthesis.
    Ubelaker DH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Jan; 183(1-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 19010619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context effects and observer bias--implications for forensic odontology.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21854387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative analysis of sharp-force trauma: an application of scanning electron microscopy in forensic anthropology.
    Bartelink EJ; Wiersema JM; Demaree RS
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1288-93. PubMed ID: 11714137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anthropological analysis of the Second World War skeletal remains from three karst sinkholes located in southern Croatia.
    Jerković I; Bašić Ž; Bečić K; Jambrešić G; Grujić I; Alujević A; Kružić I
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Nov; 44():63-67. PubMed ID: 27631869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New perspectives in forensic anthropology.
    Dirkmaat DC; Cabo LL; Ousley SD; Symes SA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2008; Suppl 47():33-52. PubMed ID: 19003882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An osteological revisitation of autopsies: comparing anthropological findings on exhumed skeletons to their respective autopsy reports in seven cases.
    Cappella A; Castoldi E; Sforza C; Cattaneo C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():315.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25315679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic anthropologists and estimates of skeletal completeness: The impacts of training and experience.
    Palmiotto A; Winburn AP; Pink C; Brown CA; LeGarde CB
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):104-116. PubMed ID: 38182306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.