These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24666413)

  • 1. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.
    Okonta PI; Rossouw T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
    Okonta P; Rossouw T
    Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research.
    Were E; Kaguiri E; Kiplagat J
    Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):372-389. PubMed ID: 32324050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey.
    Pryor ER; Habermann B; Broome ME
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 33(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 17526690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.
    Satalkar P; Shaw D
    Account Res; 2018; 25(6):311-339. PubMed ID: 29954230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries.
    Adesanya AA
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2020; 27(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 32687128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
    Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
    Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
    Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
    Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community.
    Buljan I; Barać L; Marušić A
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):220-238. PubMed ID: 29637796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitude, practice orientation, benefits and barriers towards health research and publications among medical practitioners in Abia State, Nigeria: A cross-sectional study.
    Pascal Iloh GU; Amadi AN; Iro OK; Agboola SM; Aguocha GU; Chukwuonye ME
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 32031085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
    Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.
    Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.
    Titus SL
    Account Res; 2014; 21(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 24073604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.