These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24666766)

  • 21. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Study of the extended process for mammographic film with two-dimensional shape analysis of micro-calcifications].
    Maruyama T; Yamamoto H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jan; 62(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 16456511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification.
    Salfity MF; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y; Papaioannou J
    Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 12772990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A spatial shape constrained clustering method for mammographic mass segmentation.
    Lou JY; Yang XL; Cao AZ
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():891692. PubMed ID: 25737739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
    Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.
    Warren LM; Mackenzie A; Cooke J; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Chakraborty DP; Dance DR; Bosmans H; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3202-13. PubMed ID: 22755704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):7092-7112. PubMed ID: 27648708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms.
    Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Suzuki K; Sennett C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4180-93. PubMed ID: 18072482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3-D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters using stereo imaging: algorithm and mammographic unit calibration.
    Daul C; Graebling P; Tiedeu A; Wolf D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2058-73. PubMed ID: 16366229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
    Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved dynamic-programming-based algorithms for segmentation of masses in mammograms.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4256-69. PubMed ID: 18072490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital mammogram spiculated mass detection and spicule segmentation using level sets.
    Ball JE; Bruce LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4979-84. PubMed ID: 18003124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification of tiny and large calcification in breast: a study on mammographic image analysis.
    Bhattacharya M; Das A
    Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2010; 6(4):418-34. PubMed ID: 20940127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms.
    Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 9419517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
    Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Suspicious Lesion Segmentation on Brain, Mammograms and Breast MR Images Using New Optimized Spatial Feature Based Super-Pixel Fuzzy C-Means Clustering.
    Kumar SN; Fred AL; Varghese PS
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Apr; 32(2):322-335. PubMed ID: 30402671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital mammographic computer aided diagnosis (CAD) using adaptive level set segmentation.
    Ball JE; Bruce LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4973-8. PubMed ID: 18003123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
    Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.