260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24666914)
1. Comparative assessment of the effects of Gates-Glidden, Largo, LA-Axxess, and New Brazilian Drill CPdrill on coronal pre-enlargement: cone-beam computed tomographic analysis.
Flores CB; Montagner F; Gomes BP; Dotto GN; da Silva Schmitz M
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 24666914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of four instruments on coronal pre-enlargement by using cone beam computed tomography.
Sanfelice CM; da Costa FB; Reis Só MV; Vier-Pelisser F; Souza Bier CA; Grecca FS
J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):858-61. PubMed ID: 20416433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the effects of TripleGates and Gates-Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal area by using cone beam computed tomography.
Sousa K; Andrade-Junior CV; Silva JM; Duarte MA; De-Deus G; Silva EJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 26018308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Gates-Glidden, LA Axxess and orifice shaper burs on the cervical dentin thickness and root canal area of mandibular molars.
Duarte MA; Bernardes RA; Ordinola-Zapata R; Vasconcelos BC; Bramante CM; Moraes IG
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 21519644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.
Schmitz Mda S; Santos R; Capelli A; Jacobovitz M; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 18949299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root canal area increase promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper systems: comparison by computed tomography.
Bernardes RA; Rocha EA; Duarte MA; Vivan RR; de Moraes IG; Bramante AS; de Azevedo JR
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1179-82. PubMed ID: 20630294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography.
Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SEM analysis.
Vanni JR; Santos R; Limongi O; Guerisoli DM; Capelli A; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16429181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars.
Krishan R; Paqué F; Ossareh A; Kishen A; Dao T; Friedman S
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25069925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure.
Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 15716849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment of Root Canal Preparation with a Novel Instrument, TRUShape, in Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars.
Peters OA; Arias A; Paqué F
J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 26238528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of single-file endodontics on apical transportation in curved root canals: an ex vivo micro-computed tomographic study.
Junaid A; Freire LG; da Silveira Bueno CE; Mello I; Cunha RS
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):717-20. PubMed ID: 24767570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlative bacteriologic and micro-computed tomographic analysis of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by self-adjusting file, reciproc, and twisted file systems.
Siqueira JF; Alves FR; Versiani MA; Rôças IN; Almeida BM; Neves MA; Sousa-Neto MD
J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1044-50. PubMed ID: 23880274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
