1400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24667063)
1. SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.
Hooijmans CR; Rovers MM; de Vries RB; Leenaars M; Ritskes-Hoitinga M; Langendam MW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Mar; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24667063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The risk of bias of animal experiments in implant dentistry: a methodological study.
Faggion CM; Diaz KT; Aranda L; Gabel F; Listl S; Alarcón MA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e39-e45. PubMed ID: 27083336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usability and sensitivity of the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials of pharmacist interventions.
Tonin FS; Lopes LA; Rotta I; Bonetti AF; Pontarolo R; Correr CJ; Fernandez-Llimos F
Int J Clin Pharm; 2019 Jun; 41(3):785-792. PubMed ID: 30963446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study.
Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Cavar M; Jelicic Kadic A; Poklepovic Pericic T; Vukicevic I; Vuka I; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):240. PubMed ID: 32993499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis.
Armijo-Olivo S; Fuentes J; Ospina M; Saltaji H; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Sep; 13():116. PubMed ID: 24044807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use and reporting of risk of bias tools in 825 systematic reviews of acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
Long Y; Wang X; Xiao W; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Huang J; Du L
Acupunct Med; 2021 Aug; 39(4):318-326. PubMed ID: 32811166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of "unclear" Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
Rademaker MM; Ramakers GGJ; Smit AL; Hooft L; Stegeman I
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235535. PubMed ID: 32650340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools.
Faggion CM; Monje A; Wasiak J
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 45(6):754-766. PubMed ID: 29575189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reporting quality and risk of bias of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for migraine: Methodological study based on STRICTA and RoB 2.0.
Lu T; Lu C; Li H; Xing X; Deng X; Li X; Wang Y; Niu J; Liu Y; Yang K
Complement Ther Med; 2020 Aug; 52():102433. PubMed ID: 32951707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Application of the Risk of Bias 2 Tool].
Lee LL
Hu Li Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 68(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 33792022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.
Minozzi S; Cinquini M; Gianola S; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Banzi R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():37-44. PubMed ID: 32562833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.
Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
