These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24667405)
21. Controversies surrounding screening mammography. Otto PM; Blecher CB Mo Med; 2014; 111(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 25438368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The eternal problem of false positives in mammography screening]. Seguí Díaz M Semergen; 2017 Mar; 43(2):151-153. PubMed ID: 27117788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: caveat emptor. Javitt MC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):W505. PubMed ID: 24758687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Screening Mammography: Controversy and Recommendations. Layne GP W V Med J; 2016; 112(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 29368824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Re: "Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial". Weiss NS Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):759-60. PubMed ID: 25194149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The authors reply. Miller AB; Wall C; Baines CJ; Sun P; To T; Narod SA Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):760-1. PubMed ID: 25194150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fifty years of age-based screening: time for a new risk-based screening approach. Kerlikowske K; O'Kane ME; Esserman LJ Evid Based Med; 2014 Oct; 19(5):183. PubMed ID: 24785471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation. Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The development and implementation of a patient-centered radiology consultation service: a focus on breast density and additional screening options. Sullivan CL; Pandya A; Min RJ; Drotman M; Hentel K Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):731-4. PubMed ID: 25655643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Gradualism: How Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Will Become a Reality. Helbich TH; Kapetas P Radiology; 2024 Aug; 312(2):e241563. PubMed ID: 39105642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasound is similar to mammography in detecting breast cancer, study shows. Mayor S BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6925. PubMed ID: 26715161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. AI in breast cancer screening: a critical overview of what we know. Raya-Povedano JL Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4774-4775. PubMed ID: 38123690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Increasing value by increasing volume: call for changes in US breast cancer screening practices. Lee CI; Elmore JG J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Mar; 106(3):dju028. PubMed ID: 24598716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A New Paradigm for Reading Screening Mammograms. Grimm LJ Radiology; 2024 Oct; 313(1):e242141. PubMed ID: 39377683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammography screening, what does the future hold? Serral G; Puigpinós-Riera R Med Clin (Barc); 2018 Mar; 150(6):224-225. PubMed ID: 28751081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A Decade of Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Expanding Screening to Women at Intermediate or High Risk for Breast Cancer. Lobbes MBI Radiology; 2024 Oct; 313(1):e241970. PubMed ID: 39352281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Adding 3D imaging to mammography improves breast cancer detection. Mayor S BMJ; 2014 Jun; 348():g4248. PubMed ID: 24964877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]