119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24667523)
1. The use of time-of-flight camera for navigating robots in computer-aided surgery: monitoring the soft tissue envelope of minimally invasive hip approach in a cadaver study.
Putzer D; Klug S; Moctezuma JL; Nogler M
Surg Innov; 2014 Dec; 21(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 24667523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retracting Soft Tissue in Minimally Invasive Hip Arthroplasty Using a Robotic Arm: A Comparison Between a Semiactive Retractor Holder and Human Assistants in a Cadaver Study.
Putzer D; Klug S; Haselbacher M; Mayr E; Nogler M
Surg Innov; 2015 Oct; 22(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 25957304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic systems in total hip arthroplasty--is the time ripe for a new approach?
Mantwill F; Schulz AP; Faber A; Hollstein D; Kammal M; Fay A; Jürgens Ch
Int J Med Robot; 2005 Dec; 1(4):8-19. PubMed ID: 17518400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: first results in navigated total hip arthroplasty.
Walde HJ; Walde TA
Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S139-41. PubMed ID: 17407941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty using navigational tools.
DiGioia AM; Blendea S; Jaramaz B; Levison TJ
Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():157-64. PubMed ID: 15116610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery.
Renkawitz T; Tingart M; Grifka J; Sendtner E; Kalteis T
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 Sep; 6(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 19751123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Functionality and accuracy of a fluoroscopic navigation system in the placement of the femoral component for hip resurfacing - a cadaver study].
Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Wirtz D; Mumme T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 18561082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided navigation for arthroscopic hip surgery using encoder linkages for position tracking.
Monahan E; Shimada K
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Sep; 2(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 17520642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Current state of doing minimal invasive total hip replacement in Germany, the use of new implants and navigation--results of a nation-wide survey].
Sendtner E; Boluki D; Grifka J
Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 17607626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: minimally invasive hip and knee reconstruction.
DiGioia AM; Blendea S; Jaramaz B
Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 15062704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes-based evaluations supporting computer-assisted surgery and minimally invasive surgery for total hip arthroplasty.
Ulrich SD; Bonutti PM; Seyler TM; Marker DR; Jones LC; Mont MA
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Nov; 4(6):873-83. PubMed ID: 18035952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Robotic Flexible Drill and Its Navigation System for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Ahmad Fuad ANB; Elangovan H; Deep K; Yao W
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Mar; 46(3):464-474. PubMed ID: 29168018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Minaro--new approaches for minimally invasive roentgen image based hip prosthesis revision].
de la Fuente M; Ohnsorge JA; Bast P; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1():44-6. PubMed ID: 12451768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic and imaging in urological surgery.
Teber D; Baumhauer M; Guven EO; Rassweiler J
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 19057226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial.
Reininga IH; Wagenmakers R; van den Akker-Scheek I; Stant AD; Groothoff JW; Bulstra SK; Zijlstra W; Stevens M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Jan; 8():4. PubMed ID: 17214906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-modality tracking, navigation and calibration for a flexible robotic drill system for total hip arthroplasty.
Ahmad Fuad ANB; Deep K; Yao W
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29230932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental validation of a pinless femoral reference array for computer-assisted hip arthroplasty.
Renkawitz T; Wegner M; Gneiting S; Haimerl M; Sendtner E; Kalteis T; Grifka J
J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):583-8. PubMed ID: 19950361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty.
Glaser D; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Miner TM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18022739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
