These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24667825)

  • 1. A resource-based modelling framework to assess habitat suitability for steppe birds in semiarid Mediterranean agricultural systems.
    Cardador L; De Cáceres M; Bota G; Giralt D; Casas F; Arroyo B; Mougeot F; Cantero-Martínez C; Moncunill J; Butler SJ; Brotons L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92790. PubMed ID: 24667825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landscape-level heterogeneity of agri-environment measures improves habitat suitability for farmland birds.
    Roilo S; Engler JO; Václavík T; Cord AF
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2720. PubMed ID: 36173257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forecasting the effects of land use scenarios on farmland birds reveal a potential mitigation of climate change impacts.
    Princé K; Lorrillière R; Barbet-Massin M; Léger F; Jiguet F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117850. PubMed ID: 25699673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hindcasting the impacts of land-use changes on bird communities with species distribution models of Bird Atlas data.
    Regos A; Imbeau L; Desrochers M; Leduc A; Robert M; Jobin B; Brotons L; Drapeau P
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Oct; 28(7):1867-1883. PubMed ID: 30055061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the habitat suitability of agricultural landscapes for characteristic breeding bird guilds using landscape metrics.
    Borges F; Glemnitz M; Schultz A; Stachow U
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Apr; 189(4):166. PubMed ID: 28303521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dangers of predicting bird species distributions in response to land-cover changes.
    Vallecillo S; Brotons L; Thuiller W
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):538-49. PubMed ID: 19323209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small things are important: the value of singular point elements for birds in agricultural landscapes.
    Pustkowiak S; Kwieciński Z; Lenda M; Żmihorski M; Rosin ZM; Tryjanowski P; Skórka P
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Aug; 96(4):1386-1403. PubMed ID: 33694303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the regional impacts of increased energy maize cultivation on farmland birds.
    Brandt K; Glemnitz M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Feb; 186(2):679-97. PubMed ID: 24323319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drivers of Bird Species Richness within Moist High-Altitude Grasslands in Eastern South Africa.
    Maphisa DH; Smit-Robinson H; Underhill LG; Altwegg R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0162609. PubMed ID: 27706186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regionalizing land use impacts on farmland birds.
    Glemnitz M; Zander P; Stachow U
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jun; 187(6):336. PubMed ID: 25957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Habitat availability is a more plausible explanation than insecticide acute toxicity for U.S. grassland bird species declines.
    Hill JM; Egan JF; Stauffer GE; Diefenbach DR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e98064. PubMed ID: 24846309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential of water quality wetlands to mitigate habitat losses from agricultural drainage modernization.
    Mitchell ME; Newcomer-Johnson T; Christensen J; Crumpton W; Richmond S; Dyson B; Canfield TJ; Helmers M; Lemke D; Lechtenberg M; Green D; Forshay KJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 4):156358. PubMed ID: 35654186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mosaic-level inference of the impact of land cover changes in agricultural landscapes on biodiversity: a case-study with a threatened grassland bird.
    Moreira F; Silva JP; Estanque B; Palmeirim JM; Lecoq M; Pinto M; Leitão D; Alonso I; Pedroso R; Santos E; Catry T; Silva P; Henriques I; Delgado A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e38876. PubMed ID: 22723899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-intensity agricultural landscapes in Transylvania support high butterfly diversity: implications for conservation.
    Loos J; Dorresteijn I; Hanspach J; Fust P; Rakosy L; Fischer J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103256. PubMed ID: 25058307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling landscape constraints on farmland bird species range shifts under climate change.
    Reino L; Triviño M; Beja P; Araújo MB; Figueira R; Segurado P
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():1596-1605. PubMed ID: 29996456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the impacts of bioenergy production on farmland birds.
    Rivas Casado M; Mead A; Burgess PJ; Howard DC; Butler SJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Apr; 476-477():7-19. PubMed ID: 24463022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Woody plant encroachment drives population declines in 20% of common open ecosystem bird species.
    White JDM; Stevens N; Fisher JT; Reynolds C
    Glob Chang Biol; 2024 Jun; 30(6):e17340. PubMed ID: 38840515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows.
    Budka M; Jobda M; Szałański P; Piórkowski H
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266557. PubMed ID: 35395028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing strategies to reconcile agriculture and bird conservation in the temperate grasslands of South America.
    Dotta G; Phalan B; Silva TW; Green R; Balmford A
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 26400720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extensive sheep grazing is associated with trends in steppe birds in Spain: recommendations for the Common Agricultural Policy.
    Traba J; Pérez-Granados C
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12870. PubMed ID: 35251778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.