These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24668604)

  • 1. Use of a real-time microbial air sampler for operational cleanroom monitoring.
    Eaton T; Wardle C; Whyte W
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 24668604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of rapid microbiological methods for the risk assessment of controlled biopharmaceutical environments.
    Sandle T; Leavy C; Jindal H; Rhodes R
    J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Jun; 116(6):1495-505. PubMed ID: 24575809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-time monitoring of non-viable airborne particles correlates with airborne colonies and represents an acceptable surrogate for daily assessment of cell-processing cleanroom performance.
    Raval JS; Koch E; Donnenberg AD
    Cytotherapy; 2012 Oct; 14(9):1144-50. PubMed ID: 22746538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cleanroom airborne particulate limits and 70% isopropyl alcohol: a lingering problem for pharmaceutical manufacturing?
    Eaton T
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 20169862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time measurements of airborne biologic particles using fluorescent particle counter to evaluate microbial contamination: results of a comparative study in an operating theater.
    Dai C; Zhang Y; Ma X; Yin M; Zheng H; Gu X; Xie S; Jia H; Zhang L; Zhang W
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Jan; 43(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 25564128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Airborne viable particles and total number of airborne particles: comparative studies of active air sampling.
    Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2000; 54(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 10822982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control of the aseptic processing environment.
    Frieben WR
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Nov; 40(11):1928-35. PubMed ID: 6650522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Particle counting and microbiological air sampling: results of the simultaneous use of both procedures in different types of hospital rooms.
    Armadans-Gil L; Rodríguez-Garrido V; Campins-Martí M; Gil-Cuesta J; Vaqué-Rafart J
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2013 Apr; 31(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 22525830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biotest RCS air samplers in unidirectional flow.
    Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
    J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8004418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of samplers collecting airborne influenza viruses: 1. Primarily impingers and cyclones.
    Raynor PC; Adesina A; Aboubakr HA; Yang M; Torremorell M; Goyal SM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244977. PubMed ID: 33507951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative relationship between airborne viable and total particles.
    Oxborrow GS; Fields ND; Puleo JR; Herring CM
    Health Lab Sci; 1975 Jan; 12(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 1052503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passive personal air sampling of dust in a working environment-A pilot study.
    Shirdel M; Bergdahl IA; Andersson BM; Wingfors H; Sommar JN; Liljelind IE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Oct; 16(10):675-684. PubMed ID: 31442106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the BioVigilant IMD-A, a novel optical spectroscopy technology for the continuous and real-time environmental monitoring of viable and nonviable particles. Part I. Review of the technology and comparative studies with conventional methods.
    Miller MJ; Lindsay H; Valverde-Ventura R; O'Conner MJ
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 20069798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different incubation conditions for microbiological environmental monitoring.
    Gordon O; Berchtold M; Staerk A; Roesti D
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 25336415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of viable bioaerosol particles with a low-efficiency HVAC filter enhanced by continuous emission of unipolar air ions.
    Huang R; Agranovski I; Pyankov O; Grinshpun S
    Indoor Air; 2008 Apr; 18(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 18333990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some aspects on the use of the Biotest RCS Air Sampler in unidirectional air flow testing.
    Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1991; 45(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 1770410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.