387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24669600)
21. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G
Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Tranchina L; Lombardo M; Oddone F; Serrao S; Schiano Lomoriello D; Ducoli P
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 22366703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparative pressure measurements with the non-contact tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Langmann G; Schuhmann G; Schwaiger W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Nov; 187(5):345-7. PubMed ID: 4087781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of Diaton and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Bali SJ; Bhartiya S; Sobti A; Dada T; Panda A
Ophthalmologica; 2012; 228(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 22398455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical comparison of Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian population.
Mohan S; Tiwari S; Jain A; Gupta J; Sachan SK
J Optom; 2014; 7(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 24766865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intraocular pressure measurements with the newly reconfigured Ocuton S*TT-MV self-tonometer in comparison to Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients.
Lanfermann E; Jürgens C; Grossjohann R; Antal S; Tost F
Med Sci Monit; 2009 Nov; 15(11):CR556-62. PubMed ID: 19865054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Popovich KS; Shields MB
J Glaucoma; 1997 Feb; 6(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 9075080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of goldmann applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer, and TonoPen XL for intraocular pressure measurement in different types of glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes.
Kim NR; Kim CY; Kim H; Seong GJ; Lee ES
Curr Eye Res; 2011 Apr; 36(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 21284505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Disposable Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare ic100, and Tonopen XL to Standards of Care Goldmann Nondisposable Applanation Tonometer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure.
Wong B; Parikh D; Rosen L; Gorski M; Angelilli A; Shih C
J Glaucoma; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1119-1124. PubMed ID: 30134367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Müller A; Godenschweger L; Lang GE; Kampmeier J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Sep; 221(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 15459844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Osman EA; Gikandi PW; Al-Jasser AA; Alotaibi M; Mousa A
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2018; 25(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 29899644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Rebound tonometer: ideal tonometer for measurement of accurate intraocular pressure.
Suman S; Agrawal A; Pal VK; Pratap VB
J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 23429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
