BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24669740)

  • 1. The structure of ant-plant ecological networks: is abundance enough?
    Dattilo W; Marquitti FM; Guimarães PR; Izzo TJ
    Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):475-85. PubMed ID: 24669740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term temporal variation in the organization of an ant-plant network.
    Díaz-Castelazo C; Sánchez-Galván IR; Guimarães PR; Raimundo RL; Rico-Gray V
    Ann Bot; 2013 Jun; 111(6):1285-93. PubMed ID: 23704116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks?
    Chamberlain SA; Kilpatrick JR; Holland JN
    Oecologia; 2010 Nov; 164(3):741-50. PubMed ID: 20526780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative contribution of ecological and biological attributes in the fine-grain structure of ant-plant networks.
    Díaz-Castelazo C; Martínez-Adriano CA; Dáttilo W; Rico-Gray V
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e8314. PubMed ID: 32161686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual-based ant-plant networks: diurnal-nocturnal structure and species-area relationship.
    Dáttilo W; Fagundes R; Gurka CA; Silva MS; Vieira MC; Izzo TJ; Díaz-Castelazo C; Del-Claro K; Rico-Gray V
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99838. PubMed ID: 24918750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of dam-induced landscape fragmentation on amazonian ant-plant mutualistic networks.
    Emer C; Venticinque EM; Fonseca CR
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):763-73. PubMed ID: 23551525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ant-caterpillar antagonism at the community level: interhabitat variation of tritrophic interactions in a neotropical savanna.
    Sendoya SF; Oliveira PS
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):442-52. PubMed ID: 25251455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal Variation in the Abundance and Richness of Foliage-Dwelling Ants Mediated by Extrafloral Nectar.
    Belchior C; Sendoya SF; Del-Claro K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158283. PubMed ID: 27438722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetries in specialization in ant-plant mutualistic networks.
    Guimarães PR; Rico-Gray V; dos Reis SF; Thompson JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1597):2041-7. PubMed ID: 16846911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of chronic anthropogenic disturbance and rainfall on the specialization of ant-plant mutualistic networks in the Caatinga, a Brazilian dry forest.
    Câmara T; Leal IR; Blüthgen N; Oliveira FMP; Queiroz RT; Arnan X
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jul; 87(4):1022-1033. PubMed ID: 29504629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in Extrafloral Nectary Productivity Influences the Ant Foraging.
    Lange D; Calixto ES; Del-Claro K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169492. PubMed ID: 28046069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ants at Plant Wounds: A Little-Known Trophic Interaction with Evolutionary Implications for Ant-Plant Interactions.
    Staab M; Fornoff F; Klein AM; Blüthgen N
    Am Nat; 2017 Sep; 190(3):442-450. PubMed ID: 28829637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes of a mutualistic network over time: reanalysis over a 10-year period.
    Díaz-Castelazo C; Guimarāes PR; Jordano P; Thompson JN; Marquis RJ; Rico-Gray V
    Ecology; 2010 Mar; 91(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 20426337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutualism exploitation: predatory drosophilid larvae sugar-trap ants and jeopardize facultative ant-plant mutualism.
    Vidal MC; Sendoya SF; Oliveira PS
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1650-1657. PubMed ID: 27859165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Macroevolutionary patterns in the origin of mutualisms involving ants.
    Oliver TH; Leather SR; Cook JM
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1597-608. PubMed ID: 18764883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction intimacy affects structure and coevolutionary dynamics in mutualistic networks.
    Guimarães PR; Rico-Gray V; Oliveira PS; Izzo TJ; dos Reis SF; Thompson JN
    Curr Biol; 2007 Oct; 17(20):1797-803. PubMed ID: 17949981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aggressive bodyguards are not always the best: Preferential interaction with more aggressive ant species reduces reproductive success of plant bearing extrafloral nectaries.
    Melati BG; Leal LC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199764. PubMed ID: 29949639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unmasking the architecture of ant-diaspore networks in the Brazilian Savanna.
    Anjos D; Dáttilo W; Del-Claro K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201117. PubMed ID: 30089146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Density-mediated, context-dependent consumer-resource interactions between ants and extrafloral nectar plants.
    Chamberlain SA; Holland JN
    Ecology; 2008 May; 89(5):1364-74. PubMed ID: 18543629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidences that human disturbance simplify the ant fauna associated a Stachytarpheta glabra Cham. (Verbenaceae) compromising the benefits of ant-plant mutualism.
    Barbosa BC; Fagundes R; Silva LF; Tofoli JF; Santos AM; Imai BY; Gomes GG; Hermidorff MM; Ribeiro SP
    Braz J Biol; 2015; 75(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 25945621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.