207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24669769)
1. A graph theoretic approach to utilizing protein structure to identify non-random somatic mutations.
Ryslik GA; Cheng Y; Cheung KH; Modis Y; Zhao H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 15():86. PubMed ID: 24669769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utilizing protein structure to identify non-random somatic mutations.
Ryslik GA; Cheng Y; Cheung KH; Modis Y; Zhao H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jun; 14():190. PubMed ID: 23758891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A spatial simulation approach to account for protein structure when identifying non-random somatic mutations.
Ryslik GA; Cheng Y; Cheung KH; Bjornson RD; Zelterman D; Modis Y; Zhao H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 15():231. PubMed ID: 24990767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Leveraging protein quaternary structure to identify oncogenic driver mutations.
Ryslik GA; Cheng Y; Modis Y; Zhao H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():137. PubMed ID: 27001666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical method on nonrandom clustering with application to somatic mutations in cancer.
Ye J; Pavlicek A; Lunney EA; Rejto PA; Teng CH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():11. PubMed ID: 20053295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LowMACA: exploiting protein family analysis for the identification of rare driver mutations in cancer.
Melloni GE; de Pretis S; Riva L; Pelizzola M; Céol A; Costanza J; Müller H; Zammataro L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():80. PubMed ID: 26860319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Driver gene mutations based clustering of tumors: methods and applications.
Zhang W; Flemington EK; Zhang K
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i404-i411. PubMed ID: 29950003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. OncodriveCLUST: exploiting the positional clustering of somatic mutations to identify cancer genes.
Tamborero D; Gonzalez-Perez A; Lopez-Bigas N
Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 29(18):2238-44. PubMed ID: 23884480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protein domain-level landscape of cancer-type-specific somatic mutations.
Yang F; Petsalaki E; Rolland T; Hill DE; Vidal M; Roth FP
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004147. PubMed ID: 25794154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. mutation3D: Cancer Gene Prediction Through Atomic Clustering of Coding Variants in the Structural Proteome.
Meyer MJ; Lapcevic R; Romero AE; Yoon M; Das J; Beltrán JF; Mort M; Stenson PD; Cooper DN; Paccanaro A; Yu H
Hum Mutat; 2016 May; 37(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 26841357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiplicity: an organizing principle for cancers and somatic mutations.
Frey LJ; Piccolo SR; Edgerton ME
BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Jun; 4():52. PubMed ID: 21714919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiscale mutation clustering algorithm identifies pan-cancer mutational clusters associated with pathway-level changes in gene expression.
Poole W; Leinonen K; Shmulevich I; Knijnenburg TA; Bernard B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005347. PubMed ID: 28170390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of Cancer Driver Modules Based on Graph Clustering from Multiomics Data.
Zhang W; Wang SL; Liu Y
J Comput Biol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1007-1020. PubMed ID: 34529511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. SomInaClust: detection of cancer genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering.
Van den Eynden J; Fierro AC; Verbeke LP; Marchal K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 16():125. PubMed ID: 25903787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pan-cancer integrative analysis of whole-genome De novo somatic point mutations reveals 17 cancer types.
Ghareyazi A; Kazemi A; Hamidieh K; Dashti H; Tahaei MS; Rabiee HR; Alinejad-Rokny H; Dehzangi I
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jul; 23(1):298. PubMed ID: 35879674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new machine learning method for cancer mutation analysis.
Habibi M; Taheri G
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 18(10):e1010332. PubMed ID: 36251702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing clonal relatedness of two tumors from the same patient based on their mutational profiles: update of the Clonality R package.
Mauguen A; Seshan VE; Begg CB; Ostrovnaya I
Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(22):4776-4778. PubMed ID: 31198957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine Learning Classification and Structure-Functional Analysis of Cancer Mutations Reveal Unique Dynamic and Network Signatures of Driver Sites in Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressor Genes.
Agajanian S; Odeyemi O; Bischoff N; Ratra S; Verkhivker GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Oct; 58(10):2131-2150. PubMed ID: 30253099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Current topics in mutations in the cancer genome].
Iwaya T; Mimori K; Wakabayashi G
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Mar; 113(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22582578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of different functional prediction scores using a gene-based permutation model for identifying cancer driver genes.
Nono AD; Chen K; Liu X
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Jan; 12(Suppl 1):22. PubMed ID: 30704472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
