BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24669769)

  • 21. CorMut: an R/Bioconductor package for computing correlated mutations based on selection pressure.
    Li Z; Huang Y; Ouyang Y; Jiao Y; Xing H; Liao L; Jiang S; Shao Y; Ma L
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2073-5. PubMed ID: 24681904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inferring the functional effects of mutation through clusters of mutations in homologous proteins.
    Yue P; Forrest WF; Kaminker JS; Lohr S; Zhang Z; Cavet G
    Hum Mutat; 2010 Mar; 31(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 20052764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A graph-based clustering method applied to protein sequences.
    Mishra P; Pandey PN
    Bioinformation; 2011; 6(10):372-4. PubMed ID: 21927545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. MutationalPatterns: the one stop shop for the analysis of mutational processes.
    Manders F; Brandsma AM; de Kanter J; Verheul M; Oka R; van Roosmalen MJ; van der Roest B; van Hoeck A; Cuppen E; van Boxtel R
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):134. PubMed ID: 35168570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comprehensive assessment of cancer missense mutation clustering in protein structures.
    Kamburov A; Lawrence MS; Polak P; Leshchiner I; Lage K; Golub TR; Lander ES; Getz G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(40):E5486-95. PubMed ID: 26392535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Effective Graph Clustering Method to Identify Cancer Driver Modules.
    Zhang W; Zeng Y; Wang L; Liu Y; Cheng YN
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():271. PubMed ID: 32318558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Somatic mutation distribution across tumour cohorts provides a signal for positive selection in cancer.
    Boström M; Larsson E
    Nat Commun; 2022 Nov; 13(1):7023. PubMed ID: 36396655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 3D clusters of somatic mutations in cancer reveal numerous rare mutations as functional targets.
    Gao J; Chang MT; Johnsen HC; Gao SP; Sylvester BE; Sumer SO; Zhang H; Solit DB; Taylor BS; Schultz N; Sander C
    Genome Med; 2017 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 28115009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian hierarchical clustering for microarray time series data with replicates and outlier measurements.
    Cooke EJ; Savage RS; Kirk PD; Darkins R; Wild DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12():399. PubMed ID: 21995452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ProClust: improved clustering of protein sequences with an extended graph-based approach.
    Pipenbacher P; Schliep A; Schneckener S; Schönhuth A; Schomburg D; Schrader R
    Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 2():S182-91. PubMed ID: 12386002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting the functional consequences of somatic missense mutations found in tumors.
    Carter H; Karchin R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1101():135-59. PubMed ID: 24233781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Graph-theoretical comparison of normal and tumor networks in identifying BRCA genes.
    Dopazo J; Erten C
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Nov; 11(1):110. PubMed ID: 29166896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identifying cancer driver genes in tumor genome sequencing studies.
    Youn A; Simon R
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 27(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 21169372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detailed modeling of positive selection improves detection of cancer driver genes.
    Zhao S; Liu J; Nanga P; Liu Y; Cicek AE; Knoblauch N; He C; Stephens M; He X
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jul; 10(1):3399. PubMed ID: 31363082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Graph embedding clustering: Graph attention auto-encoder with cluster-specificity distribution.
    Xu H; Xia W; Gao Q; Han J; Gao X
    Neural Netw; 2021 Oct; 142():221-230. PubMed ID: 34029998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. DMCM: a Data-adaptive Mutation Clustering Method to identify cancer-related mutation clusters.
    Lu X; Qian X; Li X; Miao Q; Peng S
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 35(3):389-397. PubMed ID: 30010784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method.
    Kannan N; Vishveshwara S
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Sep; 292(2):441-64. PubMed ID: 10493887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spectral embedding network for attributed graph clustering.
    Zhang X; Liu H; Wu XM; Zhang X; Liu X
    Neural Netw; 2021 Oct; 142():388-396. PubMed ID: 34139655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic classification of protein structures relying on similarities between alignments.
    Santini G; Soldano H; Pothier J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():233. PubMed ID: 22974051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using common variants to indicate cancer genes.
    Stead LF; Thygesen H; Westhead DR; Rabbitts P
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Jan; 136(1):241-5. PubMed ID: 24798945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.