These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24670273)

  • 1. Silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults: monocanalicular or bicanalicular intubation.
    Andalib D; Nabie R; Abbasi L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1009-11. PubMed ID: 24670273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Andalib D; Gharabaghi D; Nabai R; Abbaszadeh M
    J AAPOS; 2010 Oct; 14(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 21035069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults.
    Kashkouli MB; Kempster RC; Galloway GD; Beigi B
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Mar; 21(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 15778670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Lee H; Ahn J; Lee JM; Park M; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1010-4. PubMed ID: 22777434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Premature Tube Extrusion for Simple Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Comparison of Monocanalicular and Bicanalicular Intubation.
    Dryden SC; Meador AG; Awh C; Smith BD; Eder AE; Bohn SN; Hoehn ME; Fowler B; Fleming JC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 33(1):211-213. PubMed ID: 34292239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in external dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Saleh GM; Tossounis CM; Litwin AS; Gauba V; Samaras K; McLean CJ
    Orbit; 2009; 28(2-3):110-4. PubMed ID: 19839894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Eshraghi B; Jamshidian-Tehrani M; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):215-217. PubMed ID: 28627964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Komínek P; Cervenka S; Pniak T; Zeleník K; Tomášková H; Matoušek P
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 249(11):1729-33. PubMed ID: 21681436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Congenital nasolacrymal duct obstruction: pulled monocanalicular intubation (Monoka) versus pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka)].
    Vernat-Tabarly O; Delmas J; Robert PY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jun; 43(6):461-466. PubMed ID: 32360081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Kaufman LM; Guay-Bhatia LA
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Feb; 105(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 9479296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Efficacies of 0.94 mm and Double Silicone Tubes for Treatment of Canalicular Obstruction.
    Choi SC; Choi HS; Jang JW; Kim SJ; Lee JH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28243017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Andalib D; Mansoori H
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2014; 7(6):1039-42. PubMed ID: 25540762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of functional epiphora in patients with an anatomically patent dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Shams PN; Chen PG; Wormald PJ; Sloan B; Wilcsek G; McNab A; Selva D
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 132(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 24903661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trephination and silicone tube intubation in the treatment of canalicular obstruction.
    Sahan B; Ciftci F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):541-547. PubMed ID: 35976505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Chong KK; Lai FH; Ho M; Luk A; Wong BW; Young A
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):2139-45. PubMed ID: 23672972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
    Arici C; Mergen B; Ozan T; Batu Oto B
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early loss of monocanalicular silicone tubes in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: incidence, predictors, and effect on outcome.
    Dotan G; Ohana O; Leibovitch I; Stolovitch C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 79(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 25595447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Effectiveness of Monocanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Under Nasal Endoscopic Visualization of the Terminal End of the Obstructed Nasolacrimal Duct.
    Han JY; Lee H; Chang M; Park M; Lee JS; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):1328-31. PubMed ID: 26080187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of Silicone Tube Intubation Success in Patients with Lacrimal Drainage System Stenosis.
    Baek JS; Lee S; Lee JH; Choi HS; Jang JW; Kim SJ
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 27247514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The outcome of silicone intubation and tube removal in external dacryocystorhinostomy patients with distal canalicular obstruction.
    Buttanri IB; Serin D; Karslioglu S; Akbaba M; Fazil K; Acar B; Sevim MS
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):878-81. PubMed ID: 22388775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.