These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24671636)

  • 1. The relation between the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and long-term genetic response.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Pakdel A; Nejati-Javaremi A; Shahrbabak MM; Ghafouri-Kesbi F
    J Appl Genet; 2014 Aug; 55(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 24671636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
    Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.
    Verrier E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to Selection in Finite Locus Models with Nonadditive Effects.
    Esfandyari H; Henryon M; Berg P; Thomasen JR; Bijma P; Sørensen AC
    J Hered; 2017 May; 108(3):318-327. PubMed ID: 28082328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long-term effects of genomic selection: 2. Changes in allele frequencies of causal loci and new mutations.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; van den Heuvel J; Zwaan BJ; Vitezica ZG; Calus MPL
    Genetics; 2023 Aug; 225(1):. PubMed ID: 37506255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A population genetic interpretation of GWAS findings for human quantitative traits.
    Simons YB; Bullaughey K; Hudson RR; Sella G
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Mar; 16(3):e2002985. PubMed ID: 29547617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for genetic interactions improves modeling of individual quantitative trait phenotypes in yeast.
    Forsberg SK; Bloom JS; Sadhu MJ; Kruglyak L; Carlborg Ö
    Nat Genet; 2017 Apr; 49(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 28250458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection.
    Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
    J Appl Genet; 2011 Nov; 52(4):467-80. PubMed ID: 21584728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
    Bastiaansen JW; Coster A; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):3. PubMed ID: 22273519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection.
    Wimmer V; Lehermeier C; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Wang Y; Schön CC
    Genetics; 2013 Oct; 195(2):573-87. PubMed ID: 23934883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Zwaan BJ; Vitezica ZG; van den Heuvel J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Mar; 54(1):19. PubMed ID: 35255802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power analysis of artificial selection experiments using efficient whole genome simulation of quantitative traits.
    Kessner D; Novembre J
    Genetics; 2015 Apr; 199(4):991-1005. PubMed ID: 25672748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of genetic polymorphism maintained by fluctuating selection with overlapping generations.
    Ellner S; Sasaki A
    Theor Popul Biol; 1996 Aug; 50(1):31-65. PubMed ID: 8776837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing the rare-alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection.
    Kelly JK
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 17607507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of manipulating recombination rates on response to selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Battagin M; Gorjanc G; Faux AM; Johnston SE; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):44. PubMed ID: 27335010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequences of selection for improving production traits on the frequency of deleterious alleles for fitness.
    Kearney JF; Navarro P; Haley CS; Villanueva B
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):850-9. PubMed ID: 18997080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Additive genetic variation and the distribution of QTN effects among sites.
    Hu XS; Li B
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Nov; 243(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 16859715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.