These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24671763)

  • 21. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing.
    Kernen F; Kramer J; Wanner L; Wismeijer D; Nelson K; Flügge T
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 32912273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
    Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computer-assisted surgery: double surgical guides for immediate loading of implants in maxillary postextractive sites.
    De Santis D; Malchiodi L; Cucchi A; Canton LC; Trevisiol L; Nocini PF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1781-5. PubMed ID: 21119420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Options in virtual 3D, optical-impression-based planning of dental implants.
    Reich S; Kern T; Ritter L
    Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 25098158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants.
    Worthington P; Rubenstein J; Hatcher DC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Oct; 141 Suppl 3():19S-24S. PubMed ID: 20884936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery.
    D'haese J; Ackhurst J; Wismeijer D; De Bruyn H; Tahmaseb A
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28000275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Three-dimensional navigation in oral implantology: a preliminary investigation.
    Randelzhofer P; de la Barrera JM; Spielberg M; Kurtz C; Strub JR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Dec; 21(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 11794573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
    Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A subtractive radiographic template for computer-guided surgery.
    Marchack CB; Charles A; Matosian AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):1006-8. PubMed ID: 24998321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Guided Implant Surgery: A Technique Whose Time Has Come.
    Chen P; Nikoyan L
    Dent Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 65(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 33213716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are radiographic guides necessary? A paradigm shift in implant site assessment, digital planning, and surgical guide fabrication.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Today; 2014 Aug; 33(8):62, 64, 66-7. PubMed ID: 25174199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients.
    Pettersson A; Komiyama A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 20491812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical application of fully digital Cerec surgical guides made in-house.
    Bindl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2015; 18(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 26110928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.
    Franchina A; Stefanelli LV; Maltese F; Mandelaris GA; Vantaggiato A; Pagliarulo M; Pranno N; Brauner E; Angelis F; Carlo SD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33542168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability.
    Schubert O; Schweiger J; Stimmelmayr M; Nold E; Güth JF
    Br Dent J; 2019 Jan; 226(2):101-108. PubMed ID: 30679852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Loma Linda guide: a stereolithographically designed surgical template: technique paper.
    Kleinman A; Leyva F; Lozada J; Patel RD
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(5):238-44. PubMed ID: 19882820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided flapless implant surgery and immediate loading. A technical note.
    Baruffaldi A; Poli PP; Baruffaldi A; Giberti L; Pigozzo M; Maiorana C
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 20(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27044419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation.
    Kalt G; Gehrke P
    Int J Comput Dent; 2008; 11(3-4):213-25. PubMed ID: 19216313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Navigated implant placement using a bone supported CT-guided surgical template. Case report].
    Teubner E; Rohner D; Deak A; Lorenzon A; Marinello CP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(12):1211-34. PubMed ID: 20120091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.