BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24671778)

  • 1. Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1516-23. PubMed ID: 24671778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Episodic context reinstatement promotes memory retention in older but not younger elementary schoolchildren.
    Ma X; Li T; Li Z; Zhou A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2020 Jun; 38(2):304-318. PubMed ID: 31960469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):553-71. PubMed ID: 17087573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
    Hopper WJ; Huber DE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials.
    Chan JC
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19953422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpolated retrieval retroactively increases recall and promotes cross-episode memory interdependence.
    Wahlheim CN; Smith ST; Garlitch SM; Wiley RW
    Learn Mem; 2023 Aug; 30(8):151-163. PubMed ID: 37582610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hippocampal activation during episodic and semantic memory retrieval: comparing category production and category cued recall.
    Ryan L; Cox C; Hayes SM; Nadel L
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2109-21. PubMed ID: 18420234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?
    Jönsson FU; Kubik V; Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Jonsson B
    Psychol Res; 2014 Sep; 78(5):623-33. PubMed ID: 24173813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the role of context on the existing evidence for reconsolidation of episodic memory.
    Capelo AM; Albuquerque PB; Cadavid S
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):280-294. PubMed ID: 30084743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items.
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Crocco S; Vitrano D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1211-1235. PubMed ID: 27049596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty.
    Maddox GB; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):760-74. PubMed ID: 25616776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Pashler H
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):978-88. PubMed ID: 23690275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of rehearsal and reminding in the recall of categorized word lists.
    Ward G; Tan L
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Jun; 143():101563. PubMed ID: 37141672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrieval intentionality and forgetting: How retention time and cue distinctiveness affect involuntary and voluntary retrieval of episodic memories.
    Staugaard SR; Berntsen D
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):893-905. PubMed ID: 30725379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct episodic contexts enhance retrieval-based learning.
    Schwoebel J; Depperman AK; Scott JL
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1291-1296. PubMed ID: 29649927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes.
    Zaromb FM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):995-1008. PubMed ID: 21156864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.