These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24671778)

  • 41. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects.
    Whiffen JW; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 28080119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Retrieval practice improves memory in patients with schizophrenia: new perspectives for cognitive remediation.
    Jantzi C; Mengin AC; Serfaty D; Bacon E; Elowe J; Severac F; Meyer N; Berna F; Vidailhet P
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 19(1):355. PubMed ID: 31711448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of emotion arousal in the retrieval practice effect.
    Jia X; Gao C; Cui L; Guo C
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3241-3252. PubMed ID: 31646349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mechanisms of output interference in cued recall.
    Wilson JH; Kellen D; Criss AH
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 31297701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
    Herlitz A; Viitanen M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 1918286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retrieval enhances eyewitness suggestibility to misinformation in free and cued recall.
    Wilford MM; Chan JC; Tuhn SJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Mar; 20(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 24000960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information.
    Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25120241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of phonological and semantic cuing on encoding and retrieval processes in adolescent psychosis.
    Doré MC; Caza N; Gingras N; Maziade M; Rouleau N
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jul; 31(5):533-44. PubMed ID: 18773312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments.
    Coppens LC; Verkoeijen PP; Bouwmeester S; Rikers RM
    BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):25. PubMed ID: 27240421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Retrieval practice improves item memory but not source memory in the context of stress.
    Smith AM; Race E; Davis FC; Thomas AK
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Jul; 133():24-32. PubMed ID: 30579631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Protective effects of testing across misinformation formats in the household scene paradigm.
    Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE; Huff MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 31561745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Consolidation of episodic memories during sleep: long-term effects of retrieval practice.
    Racsmány M; Conway MA; Demeter G
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 20424027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Retrieval-induced forgetting and mental imagery.
    Saunders J; Fernandes M; Kosnes L
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):819-28. PubMed ID: 19679861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall and recognition of thematically related and unrelated sentences.
    Gómez-Ariza CJ; Lechuga MT; Pelegrina S; Bajo MT
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1431-41. PubMed ID: 16615391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1666-1674. PubMed ID: 31161529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism.
    Anderson MC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):522-30. PubMed ID: 11082860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.