119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24672153)
21. A comparative study of adult patient doses in film screen and computed radiography in some Sudanese hospitals.
Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):402-5. PubMed ID: 25889604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The assessment of the ionizing radiation dose received by patients during some diagnostic X-ray examinations carried out on the basis of the working procedures in the health care entities.
Bekas M; Waśniewska E; Wardziński A; Wieprzowski K
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2017; 68(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 28303708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient's effective dose and performance assessment of computed radiography systems.
Bushra A; Sulieman A; Edam A; Tamam N; Babikir E; Alrihaima N; Alfaki E; Babikir S; Almujally A; Otayni A; Alkhorayef M; Abdelradi A; Bradley DA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Mar; 193():110627. PubMed ID: 36584412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of patient doses for routine digital radiography procedures toward establishing an institutional diagnostic reference levels: A case study in Sri Lanka.
Welarathna S; Velautham S; Wanninayake M; Sarasanandarajah S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13852. PubMed ID: 36448529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measurement of Entrance Skin Dose and Calculation of Effective Dose for Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Kashan, Iran.
Aliasgharzadeh A; Mihandoost E; Masoumbeigi M; Salimian M; Mohseni M
Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Feb; 7(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 26156930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.
Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. OPTIMAL COLLIMATION SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY.
Pazanin A; Skrk D; O'Driscoll JC; McEntee MF; Mekis N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(4):420-427. PubMed ID: 32363403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dose distribution at radiographic examination of the spine in pediatric radiology.
Almén AJ; Mattsson S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Mar; 21(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 8882699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimation of skin entrance doses (SEDs) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in India and proposed diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).
Sonawane AU; Shirva VK; Pradhan AS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Feb; 138(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19864328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ESTIMATES OF PATIENT DOSES AND KERMA-AREA PRODUCT MONITORING IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Kaushik C; Sandhu IS; Srivastava AK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 32491168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiation dose measurements for optimisation of chest X-ray examinations of children in general radiography hospitals.
Suliman II; Elawed SO
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 23542763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?
Alukic E; Mekis N
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1105-1109. PubMed ID: 34011453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiation dose to patients from X-ray radiographic examinations using computed radiography imaging system.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Pawar S; Chaubey A; Kantharia S; Babu DA
J Med Phys; 2015; 40(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26150685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient doses and projection angle in cone beam CT.
He W; Huda W; Magill D; Tavrides E; Yao H
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2359-68. PubMed ID: 20527570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of doses received by patients undergoing radiological examinations in Greece.
Papageorgiou E; Vardalaki E; Hourdakis CJ; Dimitriou P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 93(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11548324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Organ doses in preterm and full-term neonates and infants - a retrospective study on 1,064 chest radiographs.
Kammer B; Schneider KO; Dell'Agnolo E; Seidenbusch MC
Pediatr Radiol; 2022 Jul; 52(8):1437-1445. PubMed ID: 35303134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical application of the optimized X-ray parameter model through analysis of disease risk and image quality when combining the ion chamber of automatic exposure control of digital radiography.
Hwang JH; Kim SB; Choi MK; Lee KB; Park CK
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1099-1114. PubMed ID: 36120755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PROPOSED NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR STANDARD RADIOGRAPHIC X-RAY PROCEDURES IN SUDAN.
Ahmed NA; Basheir EH; Farah AB; Mohammedzein TS; Suliman II
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Oct; 190(4):419-426. PubMed ID: 32909039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
