119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24672153)
41. Use of the VIP-Man model to calculate energy imparted and effective dose for x-ray examinations.
Winslow M; Huda W; Xu XG; Chao TC; Shi CY; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM
Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 14744051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dose coefficients for organ dosimetry in tomosynthesis imaging of adults and pediatrics across diverse protocols.
Sharma S; Kapadia A; Ria F; Segars WP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5439-5450. PubMed ID: 35690885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD "John Sevastic Award" Winner in Imaging Research.
Hui SC; Pialasse JP; Wong JY; Lam TP; Ng BK; Cheng JC; Chu WC
Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2016; 11():46. PubMed ID: 28035336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Del Rio L; Pons F; Huguet M; Setoain FJ; Setoain J
Eur J Nucl Med; 1995 May; 22(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 7641748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical x-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product.
Le Heron JC
Phys Med Biol; 1992 Nov; 37(11):2117-26. PubMed ID: 1438564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.
Havukainen R; Pirinen M
Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 8350841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effective dose for scoliosis patients undergoing full spine radiography.
Mogaadi M; Ben Omrane L; Hammou A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 21737443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in lumbar spine radiography.
Alukic E; Skrk D; Mekis N
Radiol Oncol; 2018 May; 52(4):468-474. PubMed ID: 30511934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Entrance surface doses to patients undergoing selected diagnostic X-ray examinations in Sudan.
Suliman II; Abbas N; Habbani FI
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 16973669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. An investigation on patient dose in screen-film diagnostic radiology in Lhasa City, Xizang Autonomous Region, China.
Du X
Front Med; 2013 Dec; 7(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 24142378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Suggested diagnostic reference levels for paediatric X-ray examinations in India.
Sonawane AU; Sunil Kumar JV; Singh M; Pradhan AS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 21147790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Entrance doses during lateral lumbar spine and antero-posterior abdomen examinations: generator waveform dependence.
Morrison GD; Underwood AC
Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):491-4. PubMed ID: 7788234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Entrance surface, organ and effective doses for some of the patients undergoing different types of X ray procedures in Bangladesh.
Begum Z
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 11605800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation.
Chaparian A; Kanani A; Baghbanian M
J Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 39(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 24600170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Dose estimation for exposure conditions of diagnostic radiology acquired by a 2011 questionnaire in a phantom study].
Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi K; Asada Y; Takikawa Y; Yamada M; Suzuki S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1372-8. PubMed ID: 24366557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran.
Shirin Shandiz M; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Farsi S; Yaghobi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4550. PubMed ID: 24710442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Dose absorption in lumbar and femoral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations using three different scan modalities: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Bandirali M; Lanza E; Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Brambilla R; Maurizio R; Marchelli D; Piodi LP; Di Leo G; Ulivieri FM; Sardanelli F
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):279-282. PubMed ID: 23535250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Radiation dose to the operator during fluoroscopically guided spine procedures.
Roccatagliata L; Presilla S; Pravatà E; Cianfoni A
Neuroradiology; 2017 Sep; 59(9):885-892. PubMed ID: 28721441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
Sabol JM
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Lumbar spine radiology: analysis of the posteroanterior projection.
Brennan PC; Madigan E
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(7):1197-201. PubMed ID: 11003420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
