These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24672153)

  • 81. Local diagnostic reference levels for routine chest X-ray examinations at a public sector hospital in central South Africa.
    Junda M; Muller H; Friedrich-Nel H
    Health SA; 2021; 26():1622. PubMed ID: 34522394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination.
    Welborn D; Lockwood P
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. The impact of body mass index on patient radiation dose in general radiography.
    Dolenc L; Petrinjak B; Mekiš N; Škrk D
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Nov; 42(4):. PubMed ID: 36319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
    Bogucarskis K; Salmins A; Gfirtner H; Anatschkowa E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Entrance surface dose of the common radiological investigations in Abuth, Zaria.
    Nwokorie E; Akpa TC; Mallam OP; Akpan E; Ibinaye PO; Obiako OR; Nzotta C; Ugwu AC
    East Afr J Public Health; 2011 Sep; 8(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 23120957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel.
    Simon SL
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 21617389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Effects of Focus Film Distance (FFD) variation on entrance testicular dose in lumbar-pelvic radiography.
    Dilger R; Egan I; Hayek R
    Australas Chiropr Osteopathy; 1997 Mar; 6(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 17987147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. An assessment of the dose and image quality difference between AP and PA positioned adult radiographic knee examinations.
    Lockwood P; Mitchell M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):123-134. PubMed ID: 36646545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Assessment of scatter radiation dose and absorbed doses in eye lens and thyroid gland during digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chusin T; Matsubara K; Takemura A; Okubo R; Ogawa Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):340-347. PubMed ID: 30472811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Optimisation of radiation dose and image quality in mobile neonatal chest radiography.
    Hinojos-Armendáriz VI; Mejía-Rosales SJ; Franco-Cabrera MC
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 29605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality in routine digital radiology procedures.
    Zangeneh M; Deevband MR; Mohsenzadeh B
    Clin Imaging; 2020 Nov; 67():226-236. PubMed ID: 32871427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Measurement of entrance skin dose and estimation of organ dose during pediatric chest radiography.
    Kumaresan M; Kumar R; Biju K; Choubey A; Kantharia S
    Health Phys; 2011 Jun; 100(6):654-7. PubMed ID: 22004934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Estimation of adult patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Osibote OA; de Azevedo AC
    Phys Med; 2008 Mar; 24(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18164640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region.
    Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ; Wolff J
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2015; 8():8. PubMed ID: 25788986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Does collimation affect patient dose in antero-posterior thoraco-lumbar spine?
    Robinson JB; Ali RM; Tootell AK; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):211-215. PubMed ID: 28687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Surgivisio® and O-arm®O2 cone beam CT mobile systems for guidance of lumbar spine surgery: Comparison of patient radiation dose.
    Rousseau J; Dreuil S; Bassinet C; Cao S; Elleaume H
    Phys Med; 2021 May; 85():192-199. PubMed ID: 34111631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Patient dose, image quality and radiographic techniques for common X ray examinations in two Greek hospitals and comparison with European guidelines.
    Papadimitriou D; Perris A; Molfetas MG; Panagiotakis N; Manetou A; Tsourouflis G; Vassileva J; Chronopoulos P; Karapanagiotou O; Kottou S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11468804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Results of a patient dose survey on diagnostic radiology in Lithuania.
    Ziliukas J; Morkunas G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15933102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures.
    Mohapatra A; Greenberg RK; Mastracci TM; Eagleton MJ; Thornsberry B
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):702-9. PubMed ID: 23810300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Effect of Shields in Radiation Dose and Secondary Biological Risk of Gonads in Lumbosacral Digital and Computerized Radiography.
    Taheri H; Tavakoli MB; Mostafavi N; Ashar ME; Mozafari S; Taheri H
    Adv Biomed Res; 2023; 12():213. PubMed ID: 38073729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.