154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24672250)
1. Comparative cost effectiveness of Coflex® interlaminar stabilization versus instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis.
Schmier JK; Halevi M; Maislin G; Ong K
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2014; 6():125-31. PubMed ID: 24672250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial.
Davis RJ; Errico TJ; Bae H; Auerbach JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Year Follow-up of the Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization vs Instrumented Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Stenosis.
Bae HW; Davis RJ; Lauryssen C; Leary S; Maislin G; Musacchio MJ
Neurosurgery; 2016 Aug; 79(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 27050538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment.
Bae HW; Lauryssen C; Maislin G; Leary S; Musacchio MJ
Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():15. PubMed ID: 26056630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization Compared with Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 5-year Follow-up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Musacchio MJ; Lauryssen C; Davis RJ; Bae HW; Peloza JH; Guyer RD; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Leary S
Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():6. PubMed ID: 26913226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients.
Richter A; Schütz C; Hauck M; Halm H
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 19967546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilisation compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li AM; Li X; Yang Z
Int J Surg; 2017 Apr; 40():60-67. PubMed ID: 28254421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost Utility Analysis of Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Injections in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation, Central Spinal Stenosis, and Axial or Discogenic Low Back Pain.
Manchikanti L; Pampati V; Benyamin RM; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2017 May; 20(4):219-228. PubMed ID: 28535546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Costs and effects in lumbar spinal fusion. A follow-up study in 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain.
Soegaard R; Christensen FB; Christiansen T; Bünger C
Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 16871387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study.
Röder C; Baumgärtner B; Berlemann U; Aghayev E
Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2228-35. PubMed ID: 26187621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survivorship of coflex Interlaminar-Interspinous Implant.
Errico TJ; Kamerlink JR; Quirno M; Samani J; Chomiak RJ
SAS J; 2009; 3(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 25802629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interlaminar stabilization for spinal stenosis in the Medicare population.
Grinberg SZ; Simon RB; Dowe C; Brecevich AT; Cammisa FP; Abjornson C
Spine J; 2020 Dec; 20(12):1948-1959. PubMed ID: 32659365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
