146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24672553)
1. Contralateral ear occlusion for improving the reliability of otoacoustic emission screening tests.
Papsin E; Harrison AL; Carraro M; Harrison RV
Int J Otolaryngol; 2014; 2014():248187. PubMed ID: 24672553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardization of the TEOAE Contralateral Suppression Test in Terms of Stimulus Intensity and Contralateral Noise Duration in Individuals with Normal Hearing.
Celikgun B; Derinsu U
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 35512841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
Maxim T; Shera CA; Charaziak KK; Abdala C
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear Nerve Aplasia with Detectable Olivocochlear Efferent Function: A Distinct Presentation of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
James AL; Dixon PR; Harrison RV
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 29936500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Clinical Study of Effect of Hyperpyrexia on Otoacoustic Emissions in Children.
Murthy VA; Spandana K
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):438-449. PubMed ID: 30211105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of methods for the detection of otoacoustic emissions.
Brass D; Kemp DT
Ear Hear; 1994 Oct; 15(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 7813824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOES) in neonates.
Aidan D; Lestang P; Avan P; Bonfils P
Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Jan; 117(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9039476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression.
Sliwinska-Kowalska M; Kotylo P
Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 12212856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A survey of the otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) of workers exposed to noise in manufacturing factories].
Kabe I; Koga Y; Kochi T; Miyauchi H; Minozoe A; Kuwata D; Tsustumi I; Nakagawa M; Tanaka S
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2015; 57(6):306-13. PubMed ID: 26346131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
Stuart A; Preast JL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.
Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Fitzpatrick D; Janky KL
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 29466264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.
Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Janky KL
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 29870520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Relationship between Contralateral Suppression of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission and Unmasking of Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.
Kalaiah MK; Mishra K; Shastri U
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 26(4):e676-e682. PubMed ID: 36405487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Outer ear canal sound pressure and bone vibration measurement in SSD and CHL patients using a transcutaneous bone conduction instrument.
Ghoncheh M; Lilli G; Lenarz T; Maier H
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():161-168. PubMed ID: 26723102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in new-borns: normative data.
Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Fetoni AR; Zuppa AA; Tortorolo G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 47(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 10321778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
Guinan JJ; Backus BC; Lilaonitkul W; Aharonson V
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
