These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24672553)

  • 21. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise exposure in humans].
    Abe T; Tsuiki T; Ito S; Endo Y; Suzuki K; O-Uchi T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Nov; 93(11):1890-7. PubMed ID: 2280310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.
    Puria S; Guinan JJ; Liberman MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):500-7. PubMed ID: 8568037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contralaterally evoked transient otoacoustic emissions.
    Pratt H; Shi Y; Polyakov A
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9472734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23116905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.
    Charaziak KK; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):515. PubMed ID: 28147590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise.
    Kumar UA; Vanaja CS
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 15064659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
    Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Primary Levels and Frequencies on the Contralateral Suppression of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission.
    Yakunina N; Kim J; Nam EC
    J Audiol Otol; 2018 Apr; 22(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 29301389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE; Harrison RV; James AL
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sinusoidal amplitude modulation alters contralateral noise suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 10336065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.