These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24673347)

  • 1. Breaking from binaries - using a sequential mixed methods design.
    Larkin PM; Begley CM; Devane D
    Nurse Res; 2014 Mar; 21(4):8-12. PubMed ID: 24673347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Focus group interviews: a methodology for socially sensitive research.
    Goss GL
    Clin Excell Nurse Pract; 1998 Jan; 2(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 12675074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection.
    Mansell I; Bennett G; Northway R; Mead D; Moseley L
    Nurse Res; 2004; 11(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 15227901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Focus group interviews: a qualitative research approach to nursing].
    Kean S
    Pflege; 2000 Jun; 13(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 10969580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reflections on the added value of using mixed methods in the SCAPE study.
    Murphy K; Casey D; Devane D; Meskell P; Higgins A; Elliot N; Lalor J; Begley C
    Nurse Res; 2014 Mar; 21(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 24673348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.
    Halcomb EJ; Gholizadeh L; DiGiacomo M; Phillips J; Davidson PM
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1000-11. PubMed ID: 17518876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Qualitative research proposals--part III: sampling and data collection.
    Ayres L
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 17505241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Focus group interviews: defining clinical supervision.
    Sloan G
    Nurs Stand; 1998 Jul 8-14; 12(42):40-3. PubMed ID: 9776916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-oriented data integration: a qualitative strategy in studying professional practice.
    Vatne S; Fagermoen MS
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(1):38-55. PubMed ID: 18320907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying the Pictor technique to research interviews with people affected by advanced disease.
    Hardy B; King N; Firth J
    Nurse Res; 2012; 20(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 23061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Focus group interviews in health-care research.
    Clarke A
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Mar; 14(6):395-7. PubMed ID: 10205536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews.
    Dearnley C
    Nurse Res; 2005; 13(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 16220838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focus groups: an exciting approach to clinical nursing research.
    Gulanick M; Keough V
    Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1997; 12(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 9195644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data. Part 2: Practical illustrations.
    Woods L; Priest H; Roberts P
    Nurse Res; 2002; 10(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 12405005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in combining different data sets during analysis when using grounded theory.
    Rintala TM; Paavilainen E; Astedt-Kurki P
    Nurse Res; 2014 May; 21(5):14-8. PubMed ID: 24877906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of pilot studies in midwifery research.
    Hundley V; van Teijlingen E
    RCM Midwives; 2002 Nov; 5(11):372-4. PubMed ID: 12478692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data collecting in grounded theory--some practical issues.
    Duffy K; Ferguson C; Watson H
    Nurse Res; 2004; 11(4):67-78. PubMed ID: 15227900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of motherhood: The effect of experience and knowledge on midwifery students.
    Fraser DM; Hughes AJ
    Midwifery; 2009 Jun; 25(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 17920171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analyzing focus group interviews.
    Krueger RA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2006; 33(5):478-81. PubMed ID: 17133134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics.
    Mealer M; Jones Rn J
    Nurse Res; 2014 Mar; 21(4):32-7. PubMed ID: 24673351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.