These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24673657)

  • 1. The perception of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional simulated images.
    McAvinchey G; Maxim F; Nix B; Djordjevic J; Linklater R; Landini G
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):957-65. PubMed ID: 24673657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Bareis U; Hartmann J; Kochel J
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 21355063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the Influence of Chin Asymmetry on Perceived Facial Esthetics With 3-Dimensional Images.
    Dong T; Ye N; Yuan L; Wu S; Xia L; Fang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Aug; 78(8):1389-1396. PubMed ID: 32304663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of chin asymmetries among dental professionals and laypersons.
    Jarosz KF; Bosio JA; Bloomstein R; Jiang SS; Vakharia NS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Aug; 154(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 30075922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face.
    Kaipainen AE; Sieber KR; Nada RM; Maal TJ; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):602-608. PubMed ID: 26666568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Perception of the Severity of Facial Asymmetry among Laypersons, General Practitioners, Orthodontists, and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
    Zamanian N; Jafari-Naeimi A
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2021 Jun; 22(2):102-108. PubMed ID: 34150946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 21571417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences Among Deviations, Genders, and Observers in the Perception of Eye and Nose Asymmetry.
    Kwak KH; Kim YI; Nam HJ; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 73(8):1606-14. PubMed ID: 25957876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of smiling on facial asymmetry in adults: a 3D evaluation.
    Darby LJ; Millett DT; Kelly N; McIntyre GT; Cronin MS
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 26999885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of facial profile convexity on the perception of mandibular asymmetry using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetric images.
    Duran GS; Taşdelen FÖ; Dindaroğlu F
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 31566877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived facial aesthetics among three groups of observers].
    Dong T; Ye NS; Yuan LJ; Wu SC; Xia LG; Fang B
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Oct; 28(5):518-522. PubMed ID: 32274485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery.
    Hsu PJ; Denadai R; Pai BCJ; Lin HH; Lo LJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2346. PubMed ID: 32047228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of occlusal plane inclination and mandibular deviation on esthetics.
    Corte CC; Silveira BL; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):50-7. PubMed ID: 26560821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of symmetry in the face.
    Huisinga-Fischer CE; Souren JP; v d Werken F; Prahl-Andersen B; van Ginkel F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 14704579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding.
    Ma W; Preston B; Asai Y; Guan H; Guan G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 25439208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Ciusa V; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 11289167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging.
    Patel A; Islam SM; Murray K; Goonewardene MS
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():36. PubMed ID: 26490376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust and regional 3D facial asymmetry assessment in hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation anomalies.
    Walters M; Claes P; Kakulas E; Clement JG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22749574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frontal cephalometrics: practical applications, part 2.
    Grummons D; Ricketts RM
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(2):99-119. PubMed ID: 15615129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.