566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24673737)
1. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue.
Bürklein S; Flüch S; Schäfer E
Odontology; 2019 Jan; 107(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 29777391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Aktı A
Int Endod J; 2016 Jun; 49(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 26084620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo.
Bürklein S; Jäger PG; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2017 Oct; 50(10):983-990. PubMed ID: 27809348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A micro-CT evaluation of the performance of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems in shaping ability of curved root canals.
Sousa-Neto MD; Crozeta BM; Lopes FC; Mazzi-Chaves JF; Pereira RD; Silva-Sousa AC; Amaral MCA; Steier L; Jacobs R; Silva-Sousa YTC
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e039. PubMed ID: 32374813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical transportation in curved root canals instrumented by reciprocating file systems.
Barbieri N; Leonardi DP; Baechtold MS; Correr GM; Gabardo MC; Zielak JC; Baratto-Filho F
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Nov; 15():149. PubMed ID: 26593244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Canal-centering Ability and Apical Transportation of Hyflex-EDM, OneShape, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Files: An
Subramanian A; Balasubramanian R; Jayakumar S; Harikrishnan S; Chandrasekaran R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Oct; 24(10):802-808. PubMed ID: 38152914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Gergi R; Osta N; Bourbouze G; Zgheib C; Arbab-Chirani R; Naaman A
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 24717063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Liu Y; Chen M; Tang W; Liu C; Du M
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):649. PubMed ID: 36577985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path.
Bürklein S; Poschmann T; Schäfer E
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1231-4. PubMed ID: 25069939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals.
Saleh AM; Vakili Gilani P; Tavanafar S; Schäfer E
J Endod; 2015 Apr; 41(4):548-52. PubMed ID: 25576206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zheng YL; Zhang H; Shu Y; Wu HK
Int Endod J; 2007 Sep; 40(9):707-14. PubMed ID: 17645514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Single File Systems Reciproc, Oneshape, and WaveOne using Cone Beam Computed Tomography -An In Vitro Study.
Dhingra A; Ruhal N; Miglani A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Apr; 9(4):ZC30-4. PubMed ID: 26023639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
