163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24673845)
1. Linear Measurement Accuracy of Eight Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners.
Kosalagood P; Silkosessak OC; Pittayapat P; Pisarnturakit P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1217-27. PubMed ID: 24673845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Wolff J; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F; Aarab G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170043. PubMed ID: 28467118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging.
Mischkowski RA; Pulsfort R; Ritter L; Neugebauer J; Brochhagen HG; Keeve E; Zöller JE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 17613260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography Accuitomo tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques.
Lund H; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):379-86. PubMed ID: 19700531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auto calibration of a cone-beam-CT.
Gross D; Heil U; Schulze R; Schoemer E; Schwanecke U
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5959-70. PubMed ID: 23039634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes.
Dalessandri D; Bracco P; Paganelli C; Hernandez Soler V; Martin C
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):230-42. PubMed ID: 22315209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region.
Elstrøm UV; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 21767191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography.
Molteni R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 23768878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
