These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24673918)

  • 1. Implications of comparative effectiveness research for radiation oncology.
    Bekelman JE; Shah A; Hahn SM
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2011; 1(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 24673918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.
    Chalkidou K; Tunis S; Whicher D; Fowler R; Zwarenstein M
    Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 22752634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observational study designs for comparative effectiveness research: an alternative approach to close evidence gaps in head-and-neck cancer.
    Goulart BH; Ramsey SD; Parvathaneni U
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jan; 88(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 24331656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
    Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
    Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
    Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Sports Medicine Research: Identifying Effective Treatment Interventions Through Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Lam KC; Bacon CEW; Sauers EL; Bay RC
    J Athl Train; 2020 Mar; 55(3):217-228. PubMed ID: 31618071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.
    Godwin M; Ruhland L; Casson I; MacDonald S; Delva D; Birtwhistle R; Lam M; Seguin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Dec; 3():28. PubMed ID: 14690550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-world Data for Clinical Evidence Generation in Oncology.
    Khozin S; Blumenthal GM; Pazdur R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Nov; 109(11):. PubMed ID: 29059439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality standards for real-world research. Focus on observational database studies of comparative effectiveness.
    Roche N; Reddel H; Martin R; Brusselle G; Papi A; Thomas M; Postma D; Thomas V; Rand C; Chisholm A; Price D;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2014 Feb; 11 Suppl 2():S99-104. PubMed ID: 24559028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
    Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
    Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Form follows function: pragmatic controlled trials (PCTs) have to answer different questions and require different designs than randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
    Porzsolt F; Eisemann M; Habs M; Wyer P
    Z Gesundh Wiss; 2013 Jun; 21(3):307-313. PubMed ID: 23687408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
    Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
    Witt CM
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing clinical nutrition research: the role of adaptive and pragmatic trials.
    Orsso CE; Ford KL; Kiss N; Trujillo EB; Spees CK; Hamilton-Reeves JM; Prado CM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2023 Dec; 77(12):1130-1142. PubMed ID: 37715007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report.
    Berger ML; Dreyer N; Anderson F; Towse A; Sedrakyan A; Normand SL
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 22433752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
    Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generating evidence for comparative effectiveness research using more pragmatic randomized controlled trials.
    Mullins CD; Whicher D; Reese ES; Tunis S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(10):969-76. PubMed ID: 20831305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.