These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24675023)

  • 41. Problems of identification associated with victims of aerodisaster: the Port Harcourt experience in December 2005.
    Seleye-Fubara D; Etebu EN; Athanasius BP
    Niger J Med; 2012; 21(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 23311189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Forensic odontology, part 2. Major disasters.
    Hinchliffe J
    Br Dent J; 2011 Mar; 210(6):269-74. PubMed ID: 21436819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swissair flight 111 disaster.
    Leclair B; Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):939-53. PubMed ID: 15461094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Collection and recording of radiological information for forensic purposes.
    Forrest AS
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():24-32. PubMed ID: 22376094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology.
    Steadman DW; Adams BJ; Konigsberg LW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Sep; 131(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16485302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Disaster victim identification: Stable isotope analysis and the identification of unknown decedents.
    Chesson LA; Berg GE; Megyesi M
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38856084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Joint DNA-based disaster victim identification.
    Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13661. PubMed ID: 34211052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The importance of Guthrie cards and other medical samples for the direct matching of disaster victims using DNA profiling.
    Hartman D; Benton L; Morenos L; Beyer J; Spiden M; Stock A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):59-63. PubMed ID: 20691551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Capillary electrophoresis of 38 noncoding biallelic mini-Indels for degraded samples and as complementary tool in paternity testing.
    Pereira R; Gusmão L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 830():141-57. PubMed ID: 22139658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Human tissue preservation for disaster victim identification (DVI) in tropical climates.
    Allen-Hall A; McNevin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):653-7. PubMed ID: 22269964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mutations at 17 STR loci in Chinese population.
    Yan J; Liu Y; Tang H; Zhang Q; Huo Z; Hu S; Yu J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):53-4. PubMed ID: 16857331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Digital capture of fingerprints in a disaster victim identification setting: a review and case study.
    Johnson BT; Riemen JAJM
    Forensic Sci Res; 2019; 4(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 32002488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Examples of kinship analysis where Profiler Plus™ was not discriminatory enough for the identification of victims using DNA identification.
    Hartman D; Benton L; Morenos L; Beyer J; Spiden M; Stock A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):64-8. PubMed ID: 20970265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Estimating probabilities and dealing with mutations in paternity testing--verification of DNA testing with commercially available STR kits].
    Katsumata Y; Katsumata R; Yamamoto T; Tamaki K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 2001 Jul; 55(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 11605415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
    Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models.
    Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimating mutation rates from paternity casework.
    Vicard P; Dawid AP; Mortera J; Lauritzen SL
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 19083784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Disaster victim investigation recommendations from two simulated mass disaster scenarios utilized for user acceptance testing CODIS 6.0.
    Bradford L; Heal J; Anderson J; Faragher N; Duval K; Lalonde S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20620126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A dental perspective on the successes and limitations of the disaster victim identification response to the Nepal earthquake.
    Dahal S; Chaudhary GK; Maharjan MR; Walung ED
    Forensic Sci Res; 2022; 7(3):366-370. PubMed ID: 36353317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Social History of Disaster Victim Identification in the United States, 1865 to 1950.
    Daniel V
    Acad Forensic Pathol; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 32983290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.