306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24675196)
21. Lessons Learned From
Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):41-44. PubMed ID: 31670593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Poor title--poor manuscript?
Gjersvik P; Gulbrandsen P; Aasheim ET; Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Dec; 133(23-24):2475-7. PubMed ID: 24326496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers' confidential comments to editors.
O'Brien BC; Artino AR; Costello JA; Driessen E; Maggio LA
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260558. PubMed ID: 34843564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CORP: Assessing author compliance with data presentation guidelines for manuscript figures.
Keehan KH; Gaffney MC; Zucker IH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2020 May; 318(5):H1051-H1058. PubMed ID: 32196356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The rites of writing papers: steps to successful publishing for psychiatrists.
Brakoulias V; Macfarlane MD; Looi JC
Australas Psychiatry; 2015 Feb; 23(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 25469001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dealing with returned manuscripts.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Nov; 50(11):1050-2; quiz 1053. PubMed ID: 19960157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals.
Bordeaux BC; Wiley C; Tandon SD; Horowitz CR; Brown PB; Bass EB
Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2007; 1(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 20208291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers.
Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 15547189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Revising a manuscript: ten principles to guide success for publication.
Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):W382-7. PubMed ID: 21098168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.
Garfield JM; Kaye AD; Kolinsky DC; Urman RD
J Med Pract Manage; 2015; 30(6 Spec No):13-7. PubMed ID: 26062311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.
Bordage G
Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):889-96. PubMed ID: 11553504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.
Dowd SB; McElveny C
Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication.
Rosenkrantz AB; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 26001223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Content and communication: how can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?
Shashok K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Jan; 8():3. PubMed ID: 18237378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts.
Crijns TJ; Ottenhoff JSE; Ring D
Account Res; 2021 Nov; 28(8):517-527. PubMed ID: 33393365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.
Happell B
Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 21853889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study.
van Lent M; IntHout J; Out HJ
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e007961. PubMed ID: 26423849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
